Jump to content

Gravity collapse SJC.


Recommended Posts

There would have to be an internal investigation...obviously

 

.. the astrological alignments are a little challenging at the moment but wait for even more fireworks next year with Uranus doing his edge of chaos orbits.

Edited by cressida
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you mean the quantum leap of faith in the self-confessed experts here on SF?

 

I mean the idea of two contradictory things both being simultaneously true (at least until the wave function collapses): as in Schroedinger's cat being both alive and dead until the box is opened.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How does the non vacuum of earth meet the vacuum of space?

 

Gradually.

 

How does light propagate? Once upon a time that kind of question was fundamentally important to physics, but post Einstein, they have given up trying to model the real world, preferring instead the purity of mathematical models...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gradually.

 

How does light propagate? Once upon a time that kind of question was fundamentally important to physics, but post Einstein, they have given up trying to model the real world, preferring instead the purity of mathematical models...

 

Frankly I'm not impressed with how the scientific establishment, particularly the liars of NASA bat away doubters of their "facts" with complex mathematical equations. They're worse than a religious cult the way they reach for their book of numbers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Frankly I'm not impressed with how the scientific establishment, particularly the liars of NASA bat away doubters of their "facts" with complex mathematical equations. They're worse than a religious cult the way they reach for their book of numbers.

 

You won't find me arguing on that. Except for the use of the word "liars", which indicates deliberate dishonesty: I think they sincerely believe it.

 

Did anybody ever get an answer on the relativity question? Are we allowed to discuss it here or not?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hairyloon,

 

Your second paragraph. Are your referring to the General Relativity thread posted by SJC-that disappeared from the Forum ?

 

---------- Post added 26-08-2017 at 00:43 ----------

 

Easy, because dW º dq2 + sin2qdj2, and {xm} + dR4 - rT(vb) cos3e = {t, r, q, j}

 

Mikey Finn,

 

I beg your pardon. But it doesn't answer the question. Out of curiosity,where did you get the "cos3e " from ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.