butlers Posted January 26, 2022 Share Posted January 26, 2022 Do we really think if any if this MYTHICAL evidence existed outside the deluded saps who believe it that FOX would not be running it 24/7. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SheffieldBricky Posted January 26, 2022 Share Posted January 26, 2022 52 minutes ago, altus said: I think Trump's supporters would claim there was evidence when there wasn't any. If they have evidence, why don't they just make it public? Perhaps because every time there has been any examination of something they claim evidence it's been shown to be nonsense. Many of those providing evidence are poll workers. There are also democrats. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
butlers Posted January 26, 2022 Share Posted January 26, 2022 Of course they are. Hope Rudy and the other liars about the election enjoy thier defamation hearings. Funny how they are no longer on Fox Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Longcol Posted January 26, 2022 Share Posted January 26, 2022 14 minutes ago, SheffieldBricky said: Another one who doesn't understand the USA. These are civil cases. The police aren't involved so it is up to the judges. We have civil cases in the UK as well. It's up to the plaintiff to bring evidence to satisfy the judge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Annie Bynnol Posted January 27, 2022 Share Posted January 27, 2022 25 minutes ago, SheffieldBricky said: Have you heard the term RINO? Yes. What has that got to do with your mistake of calling a former Republican Representative a Democrat? A mistake that invalidated your point. Moral of the tale: Check before you copy and paste, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SheffieldBricky Posted January 27, 2022 Share Posted January 27, 2022 14 hours ago, Annie Bynnol said: Yes. What has that got to do with your mistake of calling a former Republican Representative a Democrat? A mistake that invalidated your point. Moral of the tale: Check before you copy and paste, It's irrelevant and you're just being childish 15 hours ago, Longcol said: We have civil cases in the UK as well. It's up to the plaintiff to bring evidence to satisfy the judge. Nope. They have to have standing and ensure there aren't latches. The great state of Texas had loads of evidence, witnesses and data but the judge wouldn't hear the case because he said they didn't have standing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
butlers Posted January 27, 2022 Share Posted January 27, 2022 https://www.reuters.com/world/us/arizona-republicans-release-findings-widely-panned-election-audit-2021-09-24/ The Republicans in Michigan called the claims of fraud ludicrous. And on and on https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.forbes.com/sites/jemimamcevoy/2021/06/27/bill-barr-says-he-suspected-trumps-election-fraud-claims-were-bullsh-t-from-the-start/amp/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Annie Bynnol Posted January 27, 2022 Share Posted January 27, 2022 20 minutes ago, SheffieldBricky said: It's irrelevant and you're just being childish Getting things factually wrong is not the same as a difference of opinion. Pointing out that you made a false claim is not "....childish....". That your 'star witnesses' scathing comments are not from a Democrat but from a former Republican Representative is not "...irrelevant...". As you frequently copy and paste links that support/evidence/promote how do we know that how accurate your sources are if you make such fundamental mistakes that invalidate your point? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SheffieldBricky Posted January 27, 2022 Share Posted January 27, 2022 6 minutes ago, Annie Bynnol said: Getting things factually wrong is not the same as a difference of opinion. Pointing out that you made a false claim is not "....childish....". That your 'star witnesses' scathing comments are not from a Democrat but from a former Republican Representative is not "...irrelevant...". As you frequently copy and paste links that support/evidence/promote how do we know that how accurate your sources are if you make such fundamental mistakes that invalidate your point? IT. DOESNT. MATTER. WHAT. PARTY. THE. PERSON. REPRESENTS. MANY. REPUBLICANS. ARE RAMPANT. ANTI. TRUMP. RINOS. You're becoming boring now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steve68 Posted January 27, 2022 Share Posted January 27, 2022 17 hours ago, SheffieldBricky said: Have you heard the term RINO Is it from that niche type of website you frequent? you know the hairy chest and nuts! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now