RollingJ Posted Tuesday at 19:03 Share Posted Tuesday at 19:03 1 minute ago, The_DADDY said: Excuse me? My apologies. I was under the impression you had a sense of humour. Don't worry. I won't make that mistake again. Mine too - for some reason, I missed the emoticon. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hackey lad Posted Tuesday at 20:29 Share Posted Tuesday at 20:29 5 hours ago, RollingJ said: Personally, I don't really care - I don't live there. But - are you suggesting they re-elect a man with criminal convictions who has clearly got mental issues? Do you think they should elect a woman who's name would normally not be on the list of nominees . 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RollingJ Posted Tuesday at 20:30 Share Posted Tuesday at 20:30 Just now, hackey lad said: who's name would normally not be on the list of nominees . Why not? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XboxMan2024 Posted Tuesday at 20:31 Share Posted Tuesday at 20:31 Just now, RollingJ said: Why not? 2 reasons: She's black, and female. If she wins it'd be historically significant for the US, in a LOT of ways. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RollingJ Posted Tuesday at 20:33 Share Posted Tuesday at 20:33 1 minute ago, XboxMan2024 said: 2 reasons: She's black, and female. A comment which is both racist and sexist . 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XboxMan2024 Posted Tuesday at 20:34 Share Posted Tuesday at 20:34 Just now, RollingJ said: A comment which is both racist and sexist . Neither of which I am, but a LOT of Americans are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RollingJ Posted Tuesday at 20:35 Share Posted Tuesday at 20:35 Just now, XboxMan2024 said: Neither of which I am, but a LOT of Americans are. Fair enough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hackey lad Posted Tuesday at 20:45 Share Posted Tuesday at 20:45 14 minutes ago, RollingJ said: Why not? Because she would be a weak substitute , nothing more . 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RollingJ Posted Tuesday at 20:47 Share Posted Tuesday at 20:47 1 minute ago, hackey lad said: Because she would be a weak substitute , nothing more . As opposed to Trump, who is a disaster waiting to happen? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_DADDY Posted Tuesday at 20:55 Share Posted Tuesday at 20:55 24 minutes ago, RollingJ said: Why not? She has been 'installed'. She hasn't won any votes she's just been given the job. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now