Jump to content

Jared Omara MP ..


Message added by nikki-red

We understand that this is an emotive subject, and discussing the facts is totally fine.
Posting insults is not.
Jared is local to us, and could well be a member of the forum, we dont allow name calling and insults on other threads and they arent acceptable on this one either.

Recommended Posts

12 hours ago, RollingJ said:

Strangely enough, just read the same, and you can't recall someone for not doing their job, unlike in the real world, where you can sack them if they are not up to it -- really, really strange - but not surprising.

It's not actually strange at all imo. Politicians simply aren't subject to the same general rules of employment as the rest of us.  They - more or less - make the rules up for themselves, same with pay and expenses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Eccy Beach said:

I suspect he got selected because labour didn't expect to win Hallam in their wildest dreams and so wouldn't waste a good candidate on the seat.

You mean they have good candidates?🤔

 

11 minutes ago, Eccy Beach said:

I suspect he got selected because labour didn't expect to win Hallam in their wildest dreams and so wouldn't waste a good candidate on the seat.

 

1 minute ago, Fougasse said:

It's not actually strange at all imo. Politicians simply aren't subject to the same general rules of employment as the rest of us.  They - more or less - make the rules up for themselves, same with pay and expenses.

Very true - and very worrying, whichever side you're on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, RollingJ said:

You mean they have good candidates?🤔

 

 

Very true - and very worrying, whichever side you're on.

I'm never sure about that tbh. The public keep voting for these people so some, at least, aren't that worried about it - and it's not just the 'good' MPs either. Christopher Chope for instance keeps getting returned (since '97).

 

Always seems a bit like going shopping while wearing a blindfold to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Fougasse said:

It's not actually strange at all imo. Politicians simply aren't subject to the same general rules of employment as the rest of us.  They - more or less - make the rules up for themselves, same with pay and expenses.

The public voted for him in a election, if they're not happy maybe they should have bothered to actually look at who they were voting for.

 

Perhaps next time they will put some value in the vote they have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, geared said:

The public voted for him in a election, if they're not happy maybe they should have bothered to actually look at who they were voting for.

 

Perhaps next time they will put some value in the vote they have.

I did - I certainly didn't vote for the 'gentleman',  because I had researched him, having never heard of him before, and also because he represented a party I have only ever once voted for in the 45 years I have had a vote - and that was a terrible mistake, we ended up with Tony Blair.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 01/07/2019 at 19:43, RollingJ said:

I don't know, but it would be interesting and useful to find out.

 

At the moment he is merely a well paid waste of Westminster space.

It isn’t hard to find out. Perhaps you could stop your characteristic whinging and have a look yourself.

 

Clue: No.

 

Unlike Tory MP Chris Davies.

 

Just saying

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Pettytom said:

It isn’t hard to find out. Perhaps you could stop your characteristic whinging and have a look yourself.

 

Clue: No.

 

Unlike Tory MP Chris Davies.

 

Just saying

Had you read all the posts, you would realise I already know - or maybe you have and are just being selective?

If I could be bothered, I'd report your post, but I used to eat trolls for breakfast, now I just find them boring and tasteless.

Edited by RollingJ
Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, RollingJ said:

Had you read all the posts, you would realise I already know - or maybe you have and are just being selective?

If I could be bothered, I'd report your post, but I used to eat trolls for breakfast, now I just find them boring and tasteless.

If you already know something, then starting your post with”I don’t know” is a bit silly, don’t you think?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Pettytom said:

If you already know something, then starting your post with”I don’t know” is a bit silly, don’t you think?

 

 

As previous, if you had read all the posts, and not just the selection that suits your agenda.........................

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.