El Cid Posted October 29, 2017 Share Posted October 29, 2017 Dog bounty hunters a funny programme He does seem rather good at his job, not that I watch often. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ECCOnoob Posted October 29, 2017 Share Posted October 29, 2017 Tory government; Privatise public operations. Leave government. Work for privatised former public operations. Standard. Labour government; Overinflate public sector. Recruit thousands of non-job civil servants. Bankrupt the public purse. Leave government. Go work for public service consultants and socialist organisations. Standard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest makapaka Posted October 29, 2017 Share Posted October 29, 2017 Labour government; Overinflate public sector. Recruit thousands of non-job civil servants. Bankrupt the public purse. Leave government. Go work for public service consultants and socialist organisations. Standard. Some of this is true - your blind if you think the tories approach to the economy is any less damaging than the labour approach and all those people recruited are working. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Arctor Posted October 29, 2017 Share Posted October 29, 2017 Tory government; Privatise public operations. Leave government. Work for privatised former public operations. Standard. Labour governments too: John Reid, former Labour Home Secretary, went on to join... G4S!! ---------- Post added 29-10-2017 at 19:51 ---------- Labour government; Overinflate public sector. Recruit thousands of non-job civil servants. Bankrupt the public purse. Leave government. Go work for public service consultants and socialist organisations. Standard. Are you some kind of Revolutionary Guard for the Tory Party? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phil752 Posted October 30, 2017 Share Posted October 30, 2017 (edited) A mix of public and private is good, the bailiffs always look professional on TV Did we have 100% court employed bailiffs before, or didn't it get done? You really believe that lol: If people where aware of their rights then it would be different. Yes, Court Bailiffs were just that. Commercial Bailiffs were always farmed out, to private people trained. Now it seems that, everything is outsourced. Now here is the rub, they still have no rights. People just accept that they do. Even the police seem to assist them. When a forced entry is a breach of the peace. All I can say is know your rights. Edited October 30, 2017 by phil752 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Arctor Posted October 30, 2017 Share Posted October 30, 2017 You really believe that lol: If people where aware of their rights then it would be different. Yes, Court Bailiffs were just that. Commercial Bailiffs were always farmed out, to private people trained. Now it seems that, everything is outsourced. Now here is the rub, they still have no rights. People just accept that they do. Even the police seem to assist them. When a forced entry is a breach of the peace. All I can say is know your rights. Important distinction between court appointed bailiffs who do have the right of entry, e.g. for evictions, and distress bailiffs who don't (unless you let them in, in which case they have an ongoing right of entry) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
taxman Posted August 20, 2018 Share Posted August 20, 2018 G4S at it again, massive failings at Birmingham prison with the inmates running riot whilst staff take a nap. Yet still this craven government keeps giving them contracts...brown envelopes involved, must be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Resident Posted August 20, 2018 Share Posted August 20, 2018 G4S being awarded the power to make arrests? Would that be the same G4S that runs private prisons (very badly)? No conflict of interest there then! The same G4S that was paid 253 million by the Government to provide security for the Olympics, failed to do so which then cost a further 200+ million to draft in armed forces, taking them off their leave. That G4S. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
petemcewan Posted August 20, 2018 Share Posted August 20, 2018 (edited) Such a move should be resisted very strongly. Private police forces would be a hive for corruption.What next, private armies? G4s: Who will supervise them and monitor them? How would complaints and legal action against them be handled? How will they be recruited and vetted? This is where we might be going. https://www.theguardian.com/public-leaders-network/2018/feb/17/conviction-rate-private-police-force-funding-crisis Edited August 20, 2018 by petemcewan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Cid Posted August 20, 2018 Share Posted August 20, 2018 It is understood that a bid by outsourcing giant G4S, which has been suffering financial losses while running the service since 2012 due to having to deal with more asylum seekers than expected, was not accepted by the Home Office. Don't you feel sorry for G4S now, lol, housing asylum seekers and making a loss. Read more at: https://www.yorkshireeveningpost.co.uk/news/politics/system-for-housing-asylum-seekers-in-yorkshire-is-teetering-on-the-edge-says-council-leader-1-9309663 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now