Cyclone Posted December 6, 2017 Share Posted December 6, 2017 Strawman - I didn't claim that there is such a part. However The inquiry is believed to centre on the ministerial code, which sets out the standards of conduct expected of government ministers. The code says they are expected to demonstrate "the highest standards of propriety" and contains reference to the Nolan Principles that holders of public office should be "truthful". A spokesperson for Mr Green said: "It would be inappropriate for Mr Green to comment on these allegations while the Cabinet Office investigation is ongoing, however, from the outset he has been very clear that he never watched or downloaded pornography on the computers seized from his office. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
willman Posted December 6, 2017 Share Posted December 6, 2017 Parliamentary standards cover a lot more than just "getting the job done". In fact, that's not part of the standards at all. I've not looked at his record on whether he gets his job done, that's an issue for his constituency and the voters in it. Parliamentary standards was not the point of the illegal search of his laptop. His laptop was searched 10 years ago nearly during an illegal search, everything else is pure speculation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davyboy Posted December 6, 2017 Share Posted December 6, 2017 It seems to me that there are dirty tricks afoot. Someone is out to get Damian Green OR through him Mrs May or even to derail Brexit. Fake news anyone? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyclone Posted December 6, 2017 Share Posted December 6, 2017 Parliamentary standards was not the point of the illegal search of his laptop. His laptop was searched 10 years ago nearly during an illegal search, everything else is pure speculation. Yes, it shouldn't have been searched. It was though, and it showed that porn had been accessed on it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davyboy Posted December 6, 2017 Share Posted December 6, 2017 Yes, it shouldn't have been searched. It was though, and it showed that porn had been accessed on it. Is it possible to hack a computer, put porn on it or access a porn site without the owner knowing and without them knowing it is there? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyclone Posted December 6, 2017 Share Posted December 6, 2017 Yes, in theory. It's also forensically possible to tell that that has happened. Otherwise we'd never be able to convict anyone of any child porn offences, or most hacking offences. They'd always just claim that someone else hacked their computer and did it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Car Boot Posted December 6, 2017 Share Posted December 6, 2017 It’s taboo isn’t it. I wouldn’t agree with someone watching porn at work but tinfoil is right - it’s no different to viewing any other (legal) site. Watching pornography is ENTIRELY different to watching anything else on the Internet. Why? Because it's a SEXUAL ACTIVITY. Completely inappropriate in the workplace. Do not engage in sexual activity at work! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ENG601PM Posted December 6, 2017 Share Posted December 6, 2017 Strawman - I didn't claim that there is such a part. However Once again, point out the part about porn. You have the strawman, not I. literally nobody cares, nobody. You don't, I don't, nobody cares if he did it didn't look at porn. It is merely a political cudgel to create adverse political leverage out of something that nobody cares about. ---------- Post added 06-12-2017 at 17:49 ---------- Yes, it shouldn't have been searched. It was though, and it showed that porn had been accessed on it. And so what if it did. I can only conclude that your new found pruience means that you have found God through the Church of Mormon and that your special magical pants are a bit tight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
willman Posted December 6, 2017 Share Posted December 6, 2017 Watching pornography is ENTIRELY different to watching anything else on the Internet. Why? Because it's a SEXUAL ACTIVITY. Completely inappropriate in the workplace. Do not engage in sexual activity at work! So would that include episodes of GoT or Spatacus, in amongst the sexual activity thats inappropriate. There'll be more than one or two watched that on You Tube at work and yet feel that porn is a no no at work. How about reading 50 shades darker etc, all the ladies reading that on their 10 minute tea break and getting worked up into a frenzy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ANGELFIRE1 Posted December 6, 2017 Share Posted December 6, 2017 Just a thought. You click on a site and see men and women performing - legally. You click on a site and see the remains of men, women and children blown apart by air attack. Pornographic - constituting or resembling pornography; obscene. I know which is more obscene, and it isn't the first one. Just my personal opinion. Angel1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now