Jump to content

Council tree felling...


Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, RollingJ said:

Takes them THAT long to come up with the excuses, does it? Might have to find both reports and read them before then.

They  know what they are going to do/say but are keeping it until after the local elections . The cynic in me feels they are hiding .

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, HumbleNarrator said:

What I don't like about local council elections is how not all of the councillors are up for election at the same time. At the last elections when the tree felling was a hot topic, even if Labour had lost all those standing in that election, they would have still retained overall control of the council.

Agree. Having a third up each year means in reality there are only about 6 months in the year when decisions get made. In the run up to elections elected members generally don’t want to make any decisions at all in case half a dozen people start a petition and run to the Star with a campaign. It’s a crazy system. All out elections would be far better. Give them a fair period of time to do what they said they would and if they don’t deliver, get them out 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Fredderick said:

Agree. Having a third up each year means in reality there are only about 6 months in the year when decisions get made. In the run up to elections elected members generally don’t want to make any decisions at all in case half a dozen people start a petition and run to the Star with a campaign. It’s a crazy system. All out elections would be far better. Give them a fair period of time to do what they said they would and if they don’t deliver, get them out 

 

I believe all metropolitan councils in England are run on the same basis. Its not just here.

Edited by HeHasRisen
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Fredderick said:

Agree. Having a third up each year means in reality there are only about 6 months in the year when decisions get made. In the run up to elections elected members generally don’t want to make any decisions at all in case half a dozen people start a petition and run to the Star with a campaign. It’s a crazy system. All out elections would be far better. Give them a fair period of time to do what they said they would and if they don’t deliver, get them out 

 

Yes, I fully agree with what you say.

Our "democracy" is laughable.

All set up to make it as easy as possible for the politicians and, as hard as possible for the public to change anything,

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.