cgksheff Posted December 29, 2017 Share Posted December 29, 2017 ...... 'Subsidising', I would say, is not the right word. I was talking about taxi's being allowed to use bus lanes, and gave several good justifications for that. Subsidising is a very good term. My (and your) taxes are being used to give a pecuniary advantage to taxi drivers, whether plying, carrying a fare, doing their own shopping or whatever. As in some other towns, it should be stopped. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Planner1 Posted December 30, 2017 Share Posted December 30, 2017 Subsidising is a very good term. My (and your) taxes are being used to give a pecuniary advantage to taxi drivers, whether plying, carrying a fare, doing their own shopping or whatever. As in some other towns, it should be stopped. Taxis / Private Hire Vehicles are seen as public transport. One taxi can fulfil the transport needs of many people throughout the day, which means those people don't need to use a car and clog up the already congested streets. Most towns / cities allow taxis to use bus lanes, some allow Private Hire Vehicles (PHV's). I'm not aware of any towns / cities where they have actually stopped taxis / PHV's having access. The growing trend is for more towns/cities to allow PHV's in bus lanes. You also have to remember that decisions like this are political ones, taken by Councillors. The taxi lobby is quite strong politically in Sheffield. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob Parsons Posted December 30, 2017 Share Posted December 30, 2017 (edited) Taxis / Private Hire Vehicles are seen as public transport. One taxi can fulfil the transport needs of many people throughout the day, which means those people don't need to use a car and clog up the already congested streets. Most towns / cities allow taxis to use bus lanes, some allow Private Hire Vehicles (PHV's). Just to correct you.. they are still using a car , it happens to be a taxi.. So they are still clogging the streets. Edited December 30, 2017 by nikki-red fixed the quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Planner1 Posted December 30, 2017 Share Posted December 30, 2017 Just to correct you.. they are still using a car , it happens to be a taxi.. So they are still clogging the streets. They are using one car for many trips during the day. If all the taxi users brought their own car, there would be a lot more cars on the streets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leginemro Posted December 30, 2017 Share Posted December 30, 2017 Why do lazy pig headed entitled drivers need to use bus lanes? We can all ask questions dear. Try answering some. You have still failed in giving any legitimate reason why you NEED to use a bus lane. Lets see your "effort". I suppose you are one of the cycle idiots who prefer to use the pavements or not bother stopping at red lights Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob Parsons Posted December 30, 2017 Share Posted December 30, 2017 They are using one car for many trips during the day. If all the taxi users brought their own car, there would be a lot more cars on the streets. Like i said..still clogging the streets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 30, 2017 Share Posted December 30, 2017 (edited) Taxis / Private Hire Vehicles are seen as public transport. One taxi can fulfil the transport needs of many people throughout the day, which means those people don't need to use a car and clog up the already congested streets. Most towns / cities allow taxis to use bus lanes, some allow Private Hire Vehicles (PHV's). I'm not aware of any towns / cities where they have actually stopped taxis / PHV's having access. The growing trend is for more towns/cities to allow PHV's in bus lanes. You also have to remember that decisions like this are political ones, taken by Councillors. The taxi lobby is quite strong politically in Sheffield. Taxi drivers mostly have only one passenger at a time. At rush hour times I doubt very much that they can commute multiple people separately to their places of work at different parts of the city. When a typical person travels to work in their car, the car will generally be sat going nowhere for eight hours until the home commute. Taxis drive around all day/night. Edited December 30, 2017 by Guest Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ECCOnoob Posted December 30, 2017 Share Posted December 30, 2017 I suppose you are one of the cycle idiots who prefer to use the pavements or not bother stopping at red lights You are so far from the truth its laughable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Planner1 Posted December 30, 2017 Share Posted December 30, 2017 When a typical person travels to work in their car, the car will generally be sat going nowhere for eight hours until the home commute. Taxis drive around all day/night. So using a taxi reduces the demand for parking as well as reducing the overall number of cars using the road. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob Parsons Posted December 30, 2017 Share Posted December 30, 2017 (edited) So using a taxi reduces the demand for parking as well as reducing the overall number of cars using the road. Not really..Bit too simplistic . Edited December 30, 2017 by nikki-red fixed the quotes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now