Jump to content

Sending older celebrities abroad for TV shows


PRESLEY

Recommended Posts

I'm getting that feeling of déjà vu.

 

To be fair, it's not the only programme with three presenters, although, granted, the 'Homes Under the Hammer' crew don't go to Tenerife.

 

Must be great being a presenter on that programme, they must make a fortune if they get paid repeat fees. On BBC every day of the week, was on BBC2 yesterday and BBC1 this morning and BBC1 every morning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm getting that feeling of déjà vu.

 

To be fair, it's not the only programme with three presenters, although, granted, the 'Homes Under the Hammer' crew don't go to Tenerife.

 

What's Dion Dublin know?the estate agents don't tell us what they actually get only what they could get.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oooops ! didn't realize I'd already moaned about this.

Just goes to show how much it annoys me.

They are still wasting our money in the same way ..... last year the three stooges were in Lanzarote, this time in Tenerife !! :roll:

 

is someone putting a gun to your head and forcing you to watch it?

 

there are 15million other channels you could watch

 

it seems to be reasonably popular amongst some groups and the BBC is tasked with trying to please all arbitrary groupings though not all the time

Link to comment
Share on other sites

is someone putting a gun to your head and forcing you to watch it?

 

there are 15million other channels you could watch

 

it seems to be reasonably popular amongst some groups and the BBC is tasked with trying to please all arbitrary groupings though not all the time

 

Not having to watch this rubbish is not the point, If their doing a report about British resorts what the flippin hell are they doing reporting from foreign countries. Money could be better spent. :suspect:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not having to watch this rubbish is not the point, If their doing a report about British resorts what the flippin hell are they doing reporting from foreign countries. Money could be better spent. :suspect:

 

Oh god not this old chestnut again. Put simply its because us simple minded viewers expect it. It gives a show context, narrative and a suitable setting in which to aid any story or image they are trying to portray. If the show has a general theme of "holidays" then they will portray that "holiday" image a viewer expects to see.

 

Its exactly the same reason why weather presenters reporting about heavy snowfall are pointlessly sent out to film in the middle of a freezing cold blizzard or traffic reporters are sent out to stand on top of some motorway bridge to describe how busy a road is or why news reporters have to stand outside of some closed up courthouse or some government department's office hours after everyone has left just because the story they are reporting relates to it in some way.

 

YES, they could just sit in a studio and be able to produce exactly the same "content" a lot easier. BUT, its the backdrop and narrative which us trigger remote happy viewers expect these days.

 

Never ever underestimate how little attention span a viewer has. Television (even the most basic of things) is vastly expensive to make. Trust me, broadcasters dont fritter money away unless they had some good reason for it.

 

I dont know how much of a jolly you think a lower level consumer show presenter really has. They are hardly hollywood starlets with an entourage catering to their every whim.

 

They get to travel out somewhere yes. They probably get stay in a hotel yes. But they spend their days stood around for hours filming public interviews, gathering B roll filming in hotel rooms, shops, kitchens or some resort attraction due to be featured, do a few links to camera and then that's it. They fly straight back to work on the next part of the programme and do the voiceovers back in a studio somewhere.

 

Just like most people who are "perceived" by to be spoilt by having the luxury of travelling abroad for their job - the actual reality is far from it. Staff might travel out to film somewhere and be back in less than 48 hours. I know of one radio broadcast techie who was flown for 12/14 hours to some far flung destination to set up show but then returned the next working day.

 

Hardly a "jolly". The majority of TV crew will be very similar.

Edited by ECCOnoob
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh god not this old chestnut again. Put simply its because us simple minded viewers expect it. It gives a show context, narrative and a suitable setting in which to aid any story or image they are trying to portray. If the show has a general theme of "holidays" then they will portray that "holiday" image a viewer expects to see.

 

Its exactly the same reason why weather presenters reporting about heavy snowfall are pointlessly sent out to film in the middle of a freezing cold blizzard or traffic reporters are sent out to stand on top of some motorway bridge to describe how busy a road is or why news reporters have to stand outside of some closed up courthouse or some government department's office hours after everyone has left just because the story they are reporting relates to it in some way.

 

YES, they could just sit in a studio and be able to produce exactly the same "content" a lot easier. BUT, its the backdrop and narrative which us trigger remote happy viewers expect these days.

 

Never ever underestimate how little attention span a viewer has. Television (even the most basic of things) is vastly expensive to make. Trust me, broadcasters dont fritter money away unless they had some good reason for it.

 

I dont know how much of a jolly you think a lower level consumer show presenter really has. They are hardly hollywood starlets with an entourage catering to their every whim.

 

They get to travel out somewhere yes. They probably get stay in a hotel yes. But they spend their days stood around for hours filming public interviews, gathering B roll filming in hotel rooms, shops, kitchens or some resort attraction due to be featured, do a few links to camera and then that's it. They fly straight back to work on the next part of the programme and do the voiceovers back in a studio somewhere.

 

Just like most people who are "perceived" by to be spoilt by having the luxury of travelling abroad for their job - the actual reality is far from it. Staff might travel out to film somewhere and be back in less than 48 hours. I know of one radio broadcast techie who was flown for 12/14 hours to some far flung destination to set up show but then returned the next working day.

 

Hardly a "jolly". The majority of TV crew will be very similar.

My god, a bit long winded, War and Peace springs to mind. :roll: Its not an old chestnut, if reporting on Skeggy be in Skeggy and not in Teneriefy or Lanzarote . People have a right to grumble when their Lisence fee is being miss used. A previous quote from Martin Clunes on the holiday show, Its great being here in Paradise on Lisence payers money. Mind you at least he was in the country he was reporting on. :hihi:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.