Jump to content

What is equality to you?


Message added by Vaati

The bickering and insults can cease. You were warned by another mod only a few hours ago. Any further and accounts will be suspended.

Recommended Posts

The following is from the BBC website:

 

"Ms Gracie told Radio 4's Woman's Hour the BBC had offered to raise her annual salary to £180,000, but she did not see that as a solution and there would still have been "a big gap between myself and my male peers".

 

Asked whether those male workers should receive a pay cut, Ms Gracie said: "I believe in public service broadcasting and I do think salaries at the top are unacceptably high... but I don't have the information to say this needs to happen or that should happen."

 

She added: "I could not go back to China and collude knowingly in what I consider to be unlawful pay discrimination. I could not do it, nor could I stay silent and watch the BBC perpetuate a failing pay structure by discriminating against women."

 

If she's a senior correspondent, why shouldn't she have pay parity with senior US correspondent / Editor, Jon Sopel, she's doing the same job, just in another part of the world & I'm guessing being the BBC's China Editor, her language skills will be far greater than Sopels?

 

Similarly, why doesn't Jeremy Bowen have parity with Sopel for reporting from some of the most dangerous places on the planet?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The following is from the BBC website:

 

"Ms Gracie told Radio 4's Woman's Hour the BBC had offered to raise her annual salary to £180,000, but she did not see that as a solution and there would still have been "a big gap between myself and my male peers".

 

Asked whether those male workers should receive a pay cut, Ms Gracie said: "I believe in public service broadcasting and I do think salaries at the top are unacceptably high... but I don't have the information to say this needs to happen or that should happen."

 

She added: "I could not go back to China and collude knowingly in what I consider to be unlawful pay discrimination. I could not do it, nor could I stay silent and watch the BBC perpetuate a failing pay structure by discriminating against women."

 

If she's a senior correspondent, why shouldn't she have pay parity with senior US correspondent / Editor, Jon Sopel, she's doing the same job, just in another part of the world & I'm guessing being the BBC's China Editor, her language skills will be far greater than Sopels?

 

Similarly, why doesn't Jeremy Bowen have parity with Sopel for reporting from some of the most dangerous places on the planet?

 

The difficulty with all this saga is that without knowing any specific details of the levels of experience, job roles, responsibilities, qualificaitons, other broadcasting, amount of airtime etc between specific people involved nobody can judge whether there is deliberate and actionable inequality or not.

 

Ms Gracie has made big noises about this all being "illegal" but is it? Whilst the world "salary" is used and would give the impression that these stars are paid employees - do we actually know that they are? If there is some sort of pay structure do we know whether the complainants are eligible for increase. Do they actually have the skills, experience or years required. If yes, then why wouldn't they raise grievance with HR just like any other salaried employee would be able to do.

 

They could be freelance journalists/performers/actors/presenters who have a contract negotiated by an agent. In that cirucmstances legallity is far more difficult. After all, just like any other self employed person, they will get paid whatever someone is willing to pay them based on how much they think they are worth. Obviously that is boosted by the negotiation skills of said talent's agent.

 

I am not for one second saying that this issue isnt important and shouldn't be brought out to the public, but there is huge areas of detail missing.

 

Not that that will stop the press from making their own judgment and conviction as they see fit. Im sure the Daily Mail will be wetting themselves at the thought of a scandal that could bring down the BBC.

Edited by ECCOnoob
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the workplace it should be along the lines of, do the same job, have the same skillset, do the same hours, have the same dedication and attitude, then there should be no arguments.

Some companies now give pay rises based on merit, so regardless of your gender or ethnicity etc, that merit award is dependant on your bosses/companies measurement of your performance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No such thing as equality i am afraid,the elite will always be the winners while the rest of us will be the losers.Its not what you know its who you know in this world,you just have to try and do the best you can.

 

Whilst I agree with you, I don't think it's a complete lost cause.

Equality covers a wide area, not just pay differentials between men and women.

Even getting issues such as equality between different economic groups is something to be welcomed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the workplace it should be along the lines of, do the same job, have the same skillset, do the same hours, have the same dedication and attitude, then there should be no arguments.

 

Some companies now give pay rises based on merit, so regardless of your gender or ethnicity etc, that merit award is dependant on your bosses/companies measurement of your performance.

 

In the first paragraph you are saying job should be equal; but then you go on to say people should be paid extra if they out perform others!

 

All this equality is restricting employers from rewarding good performance, we are all different.

I like to think of myself as a model employee, yet I get zero monetary reward for it, because we are all equal. We are not all equal.

 

I used to get paid more than my follow employee that works in the same vehicle, then they got equal pay, then they were awarded 10p an hour more, recently I was regraded and I am now paid 80p more than my colleague.

 

What next, the unions are pushing for equality!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The following is from the BBC website:

 

"Ms Gracie told Radio 4's Woman's Hour the BBC had offered to raise her annual salary to £180,000, but she did not see that as a solution and there would still have been "a big gap between myself and my male peers".

 

Asked whether those male workers should receive a pay cut, Ms Gracie said: "I believe in public service broadcasting and I do think salaries at the top are unacceptably high... but I don't have the information to say this needs to happen or that should happen."

 

She added: "I could not go back to China and collude knowingly in what I consider to be unlawful pay discrimination. I could not do it, nor could I stay silent and watch the BBC perpetuate a failing pay structure by discriminating against women."

 

If she's a senior correspondent, why shouldn't she have pay parity with senior US correspondent / Editor, Jon Sopel, she's doing the same job, just in another part of the world & I'm guessing being the BBC's China Editor, her language skills will be far greater than Sopels?

 

Similarly, why doesn't Jeremy Bowen have parity with Sopel for reporting from some of the most dangerous places on the planet?

 

So she wants Jeremy Bowen and Jon Solely to get a pay cut? It's a very bizarre story in my opinion.

 

And out of the three Jeremy Bowen should be the highest paid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder how much the senior correspondent for Africa gets? And the other areas? More or less than China - be they male or female?

 

There are some huge inequalities in bbc pay structure, no doubt at all. Then there are other cases where one person thinks their job is as important as someone else's job. It's not necessarily the case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm all for equal pay and rights. Just waiting fro the long long queue of women wanting to join the front line of the armed forces, working down in the sewers and laying those bricks for all the houses that need building.
where you been hiding they been doing these jobs for years now:roll: let me guess you come from the old school about women should be in the home being a housewife/mother and not in the workplace:suspect: whenever topics like this come up it allways gets me why some men think its ok for the women to be payed less than their male counterparts doing the same job. i can imagine their wifes reaction when she tells hubby that she not getting the same money as fred bloggs and he replies i know love its because thar a woman :hihi:
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.