RJRB Posted March 14, 2018 Author Share Posted March 14, 2018 Not aware of Trumps response thus far. As I understand it, Rex Tillerson was on his way out anyhow, to be replaced by someone who does as he's told and shares Trumps position, no matter how often it changes. I would have thought that the US will stay well out of this considering their own shady involvement,directly and indirectly on foreign soil Putin has now adopted the role of being the injured party because it would appear that our ultimatum was premature if we did not follow the agreed protocol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I1L2T3 Posted March 14, 2018 Share Posted March 14, 2018 I would have thought that the US will stay well out of this considering their own shady involvement,directly and indirectly on foreign soil Putin has now adopted the role of being the injured party because it would appear that our ultimatum was premature if we did not follow the agreed protocol. If we didn’t follow the necessary protocols then Putin will hang us out to dry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
melthebell Posted March 14, 2018 Share Posted March 14, 2018 LOL are their official protocols for killing people on other countries soil like? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
janie48 Posted March 14, 2018 Share Posted March 14, 2018 We need allies to deal with Putin. Fortunately we are still in the EU for the time being. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I1L2T3 Posted March 14, 2018 Share Posted March 14, 2018 LOL are their official protocols for killing people on other countries soil like? No isn’t there treaties on chemical weapons that require us to make samples available for independent analysis when a chemical attack has taken place? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Naive Posted March 14, 2018 Share Posted March 14, 2018 No isn’t there treaties on chemical weapons that require us to make samples available for independent analysis when a chemical attack has taken place? There are certainly treaties that make it illegal to use them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RJRB Posted March 14, 2018 Author Share Posted March 14, 2018 No isn’t there treaties on chemical weapons that require us to make samples available for independent analysis when a chemical attack has taken place? That’s what I understood. Thought I heard there was a 10 day period for investigations,analysis etc. I’m not pretending to know any details but the whole incident seems to have been handled poorly from a diplomatic stance. Boris shot from the hip,seemed to have been silenced and then May issues a 24 hour ultimatum. They have given every excuse for Putin to play his game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Arctor Posted March 14, 2018 Share Posted March 14, 2018 I notice that Comrade Corbyn thinks we should give a sample of the agent found to the Russians. Presumably he thinks that the scientists at Porton Down are inept and cannot use a GC or MS machine. We had a similar PM called Chamberlain who tried appeasing people. Looks like Comrade Corbyn is going the same way. I notice that Corbyn's attitude to the regimes in Russia and Iran is quite similar, i.e. he doesn't seem to want to publicly criticise them. I've been thinking about why this might be, and have decided that it's probably because he's spent all his political life opposed to western imperialism, a stance that I have no issue with, but has adopted the philosophy of 'my enemy's enemy is my friend' which I think is a dreadful way of looking at the world and leads people to identify or sympathise on some level with some really vile people. He needs to sort his shizzle out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I1L2T3 Posted March 14, 2018 Share Posted March 14, 2018 I notice that Corbyn's attitude to the regimes in Russia and Iran is quite similar, i.e. he doesn't seem to want to publicly criticise them. I've been thinking about why this might be, and have decided that it's probably because he's spent all his political life opposed to western imperialism, a stance that I have no issue with, but has adopted the philosophy of 'my enemy's enemy is my friend' which I think is a dreadful way of looking at the world and leads people to identify or sympathise on some level with some really vile people. He needs to sort his shizzle out. He was right on Iraq wasn’t he? Could be this time as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 14, 2018 Share Posted March 14, 2018 I notice that Corbyn's attitude to the regimes in Russia and Iran is quite similar, i.e. he doesn't seem to want to publicly criticise them. I've been thinking about why this might be, and have decided that it's probably because he's spent all his political life opposed to western imperialism, a stance that I have no issue with, but has adopted the philosophy of 'my enemy's enemy is my friend' which I think is a dreadful way of looking at the world and leads people to identify or sympathise on some level with some really vile people. He needs to sort his shizzle out. He's from that section of the Labour movement that always admired the authoritarian, centrally planned economy approach of the old Soviet and Mao time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now