Jump to content

Russian Chemical Weapon attack in Salisbury


Recommended Posts

It could just be another sexed-up dossier

 

Corbyn is correct to urge calm

 

Two people dying, one in a bit of state, large police/military invesrigation etc etc is a bit of a step up from a flowered up word document.

 

Any thoughts on it if it wasn't the russians? Nobody has suggested it could be anything or anyone else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Two people dying, one in a bit of state, large police/military invesrigation etc etc is a bit of a step up from a flowered up word document.

 

Any thoughts on it if it wasn't the russians? Nobody has suggested it could be anything or anyone else.

 

You could be right. But let’s confirm that with some actual evidence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who knows whether this chap has come to the correct conclusions in his write-up, but it certainly makes interesting reading.

 

https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2018/03/the-novichok-story-is-indeed-another-iraqi-wmd-scam/comment-page-1/#comments

 

The following excerpt does jump out at me though, and as a complete non-expert, I have to agree with the sentiments;

 

Given that the OPCW has taken the view the evidence for the existence of “Novichoks” is dubious, if the UK actually has a sample of one it is extremely important the UK presents that sample to the OPCW. Indeed the UK has a binding treaty obligation to present that sample to OPCW. Russa has – unreported by the corporate media – entered a demand at the OPCW that Britain submit a sample of the Salisbury material for international analysis.

 

Yet Britain refuses to submit it to the OPCW.

 

[The Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) is a UN body based in the Hague.]

 

They are wrong.

 

The UK is submitting a sample to the OPCW.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They are wrong.

 

The UK is submitting a sample to the OPCW.

 

Good, glad to hear it .

Thanks for the info, been out all day, so must have missed it in the news reporting. Just out of curiosity, was the comment in article correct when written?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good, glad to hear it .

Thanks for the info, been out all day, so must have missed it in the news reporting. Just out of curiosity, was the comment in article correct when written?

 

It is Boris Johnson who has said we are sending a sample so things could change

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hardly comparable but I understand your point.

 

We should still step back and remain calm.

 

May’s judgement is appalling and I fear that she’s making this up as she goes along. It’s all very convenient for her and an excellent distraction from her other problems.

 

Is every other world leader making it up? Get real and join the real world, crap that it is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You could be right. But let’s confirm that with some actual evidence.

 

You mean apart from the evidence that the UK has shown the US, Germany, France etc that has convinced them that this was an attack by Russia? Why isn't that evidence good enough?

 

---------- Post added 15-03-2018 at 20:30 ----------

 

Hardly comparable but I understand your point.

 

We should still step back and remain calm.

 

May’s judgement is appalling and I fear that she’s making this up as she goes along. It’s all very convenient for her and an excellent distraction from her other problems.

 

Oh come on this is laughable.

 

You think May is making this up as she goes along? You are well within crazy conspiracy theory territory there - I thought you were better than that.

Edited by Robin-H
Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://medium.com/insurge-intelligence/the-british-governments-russia-nerve-agent-claims-are-bull****-a69b4ee484ce

 

Okay. Do I have to comment on my link so it isn't taken down again?

if comments are deleted surely we should be given a reason in order to not make the same mistake again.

 

BTW, I think some of the views in the article are very interesting and might shed a little more light on the situation..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.