Jump to content

Britain First banned by Facebook


Recommended Posts

Which politicians were involved?

 

Try this one, for starters.

https://www.theguardian.com/media/2017/dec/19/mps-press-social-media-firms-over-failure-to-take-down-hate-speech

 

There is co-ordinated pressure in the western world to control social media.

 

In America.

https://www.theguardian.com/media/2017/dec/19/mps-press-social-media-firms-over-failure-to-take-down-hate-speech

 

In Sweden.

https://www.timesofisrael.com/google-under-fire-for-anti-semitic-search-results-in-sweden/

 

In Germany.

https://www.theguardian.com/media/2017/jun/30/germany-approves-plans-to-fine-social-media-firms-up-to-50m

 

Look, there is literally tons of this stuff happening. It is a battle for influence.

Mainstream politicians and the mainstream media both do not have the control and the influence that they used to have. Politicians especially want that control and influence back. This means trying to control what's available on line on Facebook, on Youtube and on Twitter.

 

My kids (late twenties and thirty) rarely buy a newspaper and never watch TV news, the traditional sources of how people are influenced. They get their news from the web. Which up to press is allowing a far greater variety of views than the UK media.

 

Given all that I think that this is just the start. In the future sites like the relentlessly anti-immigrant and anti-Islam Breitbart will certainly be closed down (or try to be closed down). After that maybe even sites like Spiked or Guido Fawkes.

 

We'll see. But to just think that this sanction is just being applied against one group in one country is wrong, and the idea that it will stop there is equally wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Try this one, for starters.

https://www.theguardian.com/media/2017/dec/19/mps-press-social-media-firms-over-failure-to-take-down-hate-speech

 

There is co-ordinated pressure in the western world to control social media.

 

In America.

https://www.theguardian.com/media/2017/dec/19/mps-press-social-media-firms-over-failure-to-take-down-hate-speech

 

In Sweden.

https://www.timesofisrael.com/google-under-fire-for-anti-semitic-search-results-in-sweden/

 

In Germany.

https://www.theguardian.com/media/2017/jun/30/germany-approves-plans-to-fine-social-media-firms-up-to-50m

 

Look, there is literally tons of this stuff happening. It is a battle for influence.

Mainstream politicians and the mainstream media both do not have the control and the influence that they used to have. Politicians especially want that control and influence back. This means trying to control what's available on line on Facebook, on Youtube and on Twitter.

 

My kids (late twenties and thirty) rarely buy a newspaper and never watch TV news, the traditional sources of how people are influenced. They get their news from the web. Which up to press is allowing a far greater variety of views than the UK media.

 

Given all that I think that this is just the start. In the future sites like the relentlessly anti-immigrant and anti-Islam Breitbart will certainly be closed down (or try to be closed down). After that maybe even sites like Spiked or Guido Fawkes.

 

We'll see. But to just think that this sanction is just being applied against one group in one country is wrong, and the idea that it will stop there is equally wrong.

 

Take off the tin helmet, this isnt about social media control, its about a group of hateful individuals who have spent the last few years steadily growing in influence peddling hate (race hate) they are EXACTLY the same as the islamic extremists, who have been banned, locked up, "censored" as much as we can for years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Take off the tin helmet, this isnt about social media control, its about a group of hateful individuals who have spent the last few years steadily growing in influence peddling hate (race hate) they are EXACTLY the same as the islamic extremists, who have been banned, locked up, "censored" as much as we can for years.

 

My Bold

Yeah I remember when BF murdered those people on Westminster bridge, London bridge and the Manchester Arena.

Oh, wait....

 

As for BF being banned from FB.

I dont agree with much of what they stand for but I defend their right to say it.

Edited by Dimple
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My Bold

Yeah I remember when BF murdered those people on Westminster bridge, London bridge and the Manchester Arena.

Oh, wait....

 

As for BF being banned from FB.

I dont agree with much of what they stand for but I defend their right to say.

oh come on, they have the exact same motives for their hate speech, anger others, make others do things.

Weve seen it with Hooky, he didnt go round killing people he convinced others to do it, Britain first are exactly the same.

There also has been an increase in right wing extremists attacks too (i know youll deny it but whatever)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

oh come on, they have the exact same motives for their hate speech, anger others, make others do things.

 

And blow people up?

Chop people up?

Run trucks into crowds?

BF and islam really are not the same thing and I suspect deep down you know this to be true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Take off the tin helmet, this isnt about social media control,

I provided evidence to support my opinion, which is pretty much the opposite of tin foil hattery, I'd have thought.

Got to disagree about the social media control, because imo that is exactly the aim of western politicians.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.