Car Boot Posted May 20, 2018 Share Posted May 20, 2018 Quite, clearly it's hit a a raw nerve Enjoy It certainly has. And I am. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hackey lad Posted May 20, 2018 Share Posted May 20, 2018 (edited) Oh Lord. Give me strength. I’m not calling Jonny5 a racist or accusing him of anything. I made a comment to demonstrate the ridiculousness of attacking the word gammon as racist. why the mention of numerals in the username ( obviously referring to you ) ? then the accusation of racism ? Are you trying (poorly) to be ironic ? Why am I being desperate ? Edited May 20, 2018 by hackey lad Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Car Boot Posted May 20, 2018 Share Posted May 20, 2018 why the mention of numerals in the username ( obviously referring to you ) ? then the accusation of racism ? Are you trying (poorly) to be ironic ? The vast majority of the posts on this thread defending the use of the word gammon to insult a group of people are incoherent, ill-thought out and poorly worded. I don't blame anyone for getting confused about the meaning behind certain posts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hackey lad Posted May 20, 2018 Share Posted May 20, 2018 The vast majority of the posts on this thread defending the use of the word gammon to insult a group of people are incoherent, ill-thought out and poorly worded. I don't blame anyone for getting confused about the meaning behind certain posts. Especially those that are trying to be clever but fall flat on their face . Said before I couldn't care less about it but certain posters wouldn't answer that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mister M Posted May 20, 2018 Author Share Posted May 20, 2018 The vast majority of the posts on this thread defending the use of the word gammon to insult a group of people are incoherent, ill-thought out and poorly worded. I don't blame anyone for getting confused about the meaning behind certain posts. That's very noble of you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Car Boot Posted May 20, 2018 Share Posted May 20, 2018 That's very noble of you Perhaps if the quality of those posts defending the right to insult people by comparing them to a dead pig were more credible I wouldn't have to make such a statement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I1L2T3 Posted May 20, 2018 Share Posted May 20, 2018 why the mention of numerals in the username ( obviously referring to you ) ? then the accusation of racism ? Are you trying (poorly) to be ironic ? Why am I being desperate ? Because Jonny5 has a numeral in his username too, and he was beating up on me a bit. You can’t be any more racist over a numeral than you can by somebody getting flushed because they are angry. Ends there. It was light hearted. A bit abstract maybe. But certainly no accusations on my part. Like I said you are getting desperate. ---------- Post added 21-05-2018 at 00:32 ---------- The vast majority of the posts on this thread defending the use of the word gammon to insult a group of people are incoherent, ill-thought out and poorly worded. I don't blame anyone for getting confused about the meaning behind certain posts. The flaw in your argument is that it is not a group of people, but a small subset of middle aged people with anger management issues who choose to behave in undignified ways on national TV You so desperately want to imagine this as socialists labelling the whole white middle aged population of places like Mansfield or Hartlepool as gammons. But nobody has ever even said that, or anything remotely like it. A question for you: what’s the record height of a straw man? You must have the world record by now with the one you are building. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Branyy Posted May 21, 2018 Share Posted May 21, 2018 The flaw in your argument is that it is not a group of people, but a small subset of middle aged people with anger management issues who choose to behave in undignified ways on national TV I've been informed in this thread that this small subset concerns "middle aged white men" specifically. Since this discrimination is based on skin colour (or ethnicity, to be precise) it sounds pretty racist, by definition Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Car Boot Posted May 21, 2018 Share Posted May 21, 2018 Because Jonny5 has a numeral in his username too, and he was beating up on me a bit. You can’t be any more racist over a numeral than you can by somebody getting flushed because they are angry. Ends there. Its fascinating observing how you twist and squirm, tying yourself in rhetorical knots in a futile attempt to somehow convince yourself, and others, that using a pejorative term dripping with hatred to dehumanise a particular group based on their appearance isn't somehow racist. When it most certainly is. The flaw in your argument is that it is not a group of people, but a small subset of middle aged people with anger management issues who choose to behave in undignified ways on national TV So, according to your warped logic, its not even a group of people you are comparing to a dead pig? A subset is still part of a larger group. The larger group is all white people. The subset to which you refer, but refuse to acknowledge as being any sort of group, is specifically middle-aged white males. You so desperately want to imagine this as socialists labelling the whole white middle aged population of places like Mansfield or Hartlepool as gammons. But nobody has ever even said that, or anything remotely like it. A question for you: what’s the record height of a straw man? You must have the world record by now with the one you are building. You have accused other contributors to this discussion as being 'desperate'. That's unfortunate. I suspect you know in your heart that you are defending the indefensible and are appearing increasingly desperate and unstable in doing so. Time to give it up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mossdog Posted May 21, 2018 Share Posted May 21, 2018 Its fascinating observing how you twist and squirm, tying yourself in rhetorical knots in a futile attempt to somehow convince yourself, and others, that using a pejorative term dripping with hatred to dehumanise a particular group based on their appearance isn't somehow racist. When it most certainly is. So, according to your warped logic, its not even a group of people you are comparing to a dead pig? A subset is still part of a larger group. The larger group is all white people. The subset to which you refer, but refuse to acknowledge as being any sort of group, is specifically middle-aged white males. You have accused other contributors to this discussion as being 'desperate'. That's unfortunate. I suspect you know in your heart that you are defending the indefensible and are appearing increasingly desperate and unstable in doing so. Time to give it up. .....you know the saying!.......'there's no joy in Socialism!'.........more a deep seated sense of failure and anger! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now