The Consequences of Brexit [part 5] Read 1st post before posting

[tinfoilhat]

Aka rich tax dodger moves to a tax haven.

Monaco isn't a full eu member anyway, plus whatever happens post brexit in the uk won't affect his personal finances will it? Its a twisted story. There's better stories than this, hang on to it if you think it's convincing in any way.

 

---------- Post added 23-10-2018 at 11:34 ----------

 

Why did you enjoy the dyson story so much?

Im not a conservative, so I'm not surprised by other things they do. It doesn't alter Osbornes campaign lie about the emergency budget.

 

You want to start adding up who lied about what on the run up to the referendum?

 

Besides, there was one of sorts, rather than cutting further, and George did like cutting stuff, Hammond went for quantitive easing instead when the pound fell through the floor.

[truman]

Aka rich tax dodger moves to a tax haven.

Monaco isn't a full eu member anyway, plus whatever happens post brexit in the uk won't affect his personal finances will it? Its a twisted story. There's better stories than this, hang on to it if you think it's convincing in any way.

 

Monaco has more ties with the EU than we will have with a more than likely "no deal" exit... "I'm alright Jack" springs to mind...

[Cyclone]

Why did you enjoy the dyson story so much?

 

Schadenfreude I guess.

 

Dyson was strongly in favour of brexit, claiming it would benefit the UK. But hypocritically he's moving his manufacturing out of the UK, so we don't benefit from it.

[L00b]

Why did you enjoy the dyson story so much?

Because he’s a Brexit figurehead doing PR for the ‘sunlit uplands’, who’s been happy trousering EU CAP payments (and pushing for GB/DEFRA replacement subsidies post-2019) but, like JRM, Redwood and all the other Brexit figureheads, doesn’t give two figs about helping a Brexited UK actually get there through domestic investments and job creation.

 

He was hinting at locating that plant in the U.K. only last week. Today’s bit of PR mentions ‘supply chains’, ‘market access’ and ‘local talent’ as the reasons for selecting SG: ie everything which Brexit was supposed to be about for the U.K.

 

You’ve been had. You’re pretty much too late to do anything about it. And you still don’t see it: that’s the enjoyable bit. Because the worse it gets, the greater the eventual awakening and the deeper the reforms. You need them.

Im not a conservative, so I'm not surprised by other things they do. It doesn't alter Osbornes campaign lie about the emergency budget.

Any advances on Hammond’s Brexit-dedicated £60bn not amounting to an ‘emergency budget’?

 

Or does it have to be called an ‘emergency budget’ for you to connect the dots?

Edited October 23, 2018 by L00b

[woodview]

You want to start adding up who lied about what on the run up to the referendum?

 

Besides, there was one of sorts, rather than cutting further, and George did like cutting stuff, Hammond went for quantitive easing instead when the pound fell through the floor.

I agree, both sides lied. This thread is titled 'the consequences of brexi' , since it's the budget on Monday, I'm highlighting one of the lies peddaled by the chancellor and PM.

There's a big tendency for people.to want to 'win' an argument. Most people in the country voted by balancing pros and cons, not by being fixated on one set of opinions.

 

Loob, I'm not reply+quoting your bitter rant, but you need to get a grip of yourself. So much venom in there. Not a conversatoon I want to be involved in. Your figureheads of Osborne and Cameron will fight the corner for you, I'm sure.

Edited October 23, 2018 by woodview

[melthebell]

Most people in the country voted by balancing pros and cons, not by being fixated on one set of opinions.

hahahahahahahaha

 

hahahahahahahahaha

 

hahahahahahahahahaha

 

no they didnt, they voted out of blind devotion to lies thats been peddled by mr farage etc for decades, theres barely any pros mentioned even now, and they blindly ignore any cons that get mentioned as "project fear"

[woodview]

hahahahahahahaha

 

hahahahahahahahaha

 

hahahahahahahahahaha

 

no they didnt, they voted out of blind devotion to lies thats been peddled by mr farage etc for decades, theres barely any pros mentioned even now, and they blindly ignore any cons that get mentioned as "project fear"

By the same token Remain voters did so by blind devotion to Cameron. I can't buy into anybodies divisve nasty 'us and them' mentalities. Luckily most people in real life don't take your outlook.

[L00b]

Loob, I'm not reply+quoting your bitter rant, but you need to get a grip of yourself. So much venom in there. Not a conversatoon I want to be involved in. Your figureheads of Osborne and Cameron will fight the corner for you, I'm sure.

I’m not surprised, after debunking your ‘no emergency budget’ argument.

 

Feel free to put me on ignore, btw. Less risk to your cognitive bias

 

(I don’t have any ‘figureheads’ btw: I’ve left the U.K., nothing left there, washed my hands clean off it; so now you’re just “the competition”, no different to US or CN or <...> wherein the worse you get in competitive terms, the better for us ).

Edited October 23, 2018 by L00b

[Dromedary]

Whether it washes with you or not, polls of leave voters' reasons for voting that way rank as follows.

 

1. Immigration. 41%

 

2. Sovereignty. 30%

 

3. Money paid to the EU. 15%

 

(Good to here you are recovering well!)

 

Depends on how you define Immigration then as I the vast majority of imigrants to the UK have not been black or brown.

[woodview]

I’m not surprised, after debunking your ‘no emergency budget’ argument.

 

Feel free to put me on ignore, btw. Less risk to your cognitive bias

Sorry, I forgot everybody with the 'wrong' opinion has cognitive bias, whereas you carefully weigh up all information from all sources and come to the correct informed decision. Have a nice day.