Jump to content

The Consequences of Brexit [part 5] Read 1st post before posting


Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Car Boot said:

A second referendum based on what? The data of undemocratic and increasingly inaccurate polling organisations being funded by who? You want to sell our democracy to whoever can afford to ask a small section of the public biased questions in a poll!

Based on the now more clear options and consequences for exiting the union.

 

I want our democracy not to be trolled by the russian state and a minority of oligarchs into making a huge mistake.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Cyclone said:

Based on the now more clear options and consequences for exiting the union.

 

I want our democracy not to be trolled by the russian state and a minority of oligarchs into making a huge mistake.

What you want is a Russian managed style  democracy  where the status quo always remains  the same after elections.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Cyclone said:

What you want is desperately to leave the EU despite the change in opinion against it.

What you want is a 'managed' or 'guided' democracy here in the UK - so that the people can exercise all their democratic voting rights (say in a referendum) without ever changing establishment policy. Vote for change, get the status quo, EU style.

6 minutes ago, andyofborg said:

whats wrong with the status quo if its the best option available?

That's exactly what Vladimir Putin says.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Lockdoctor said:

What you want is a Russian managed style  democracy  where the status quo always remains  the same after elections.

This wasn't an election, elections are fully reversible. That is true democracy in action, not the form you think it is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Dardandec said:

This wasn't an election, elections are fully reversible. That is true democracy in action, not the form you think it is.

If Remain won a second referendum would you be happy to hold another one afterwards...

 

just in case the people had changed their minds again?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Car Boot said:

If Remain won a second referendum would you be happy to hold another one afterwards...

If the majority of the electorate want one as a result of a change in circumstance, then yes.

 

16 minutes ago, Car Boot said:

just in case the people had changed their minds again?

Of course, they *would* have to change their minds, that seems unlikely given that a remain vote will bring lots of good economic news, in stark contrast to everything Brexit related so far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Dardandec said:

This wasn't an election, elections are fully reversible. That is true democracy in action, not the form you think it is.

Of course the EU referendum was an election.  By all means after the result of the 2016 EU has been implemented and a reasonable time has elapsed then discussions about whether the UK want to rejoin the EU should take place in a democratic society.   It would be ludicrous if a political party won a  UK  General Election and there was another General Election before the party who had just won the General Election formed a Government.

1 hour ago, tinfoilhat said:

Yep. Why not?

What we need now is closure. The only was for closure and to end the none sense is for the UK to leave the EU on 29th March.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.