TwoFour Posted June 5, 2006 Share Posted June 5, 2006 ....oh he's a dj ok...dysfunctional jerk!!! good argument Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TwoFour Posted June 5, 2006 Share Posted June 5, 2006 well i personally think they are probably guilty This has got to be the funniest post of the year. Look at the (your) title of the thread and then ask yourself why you bothered Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anlabystreet Posted June 5, 2006 Author Share Posted June 5, 2006 Eh? What do you base that on? The colour of their skin? The Sunday People? Here we go again with the old chestnut.....if all else fails use a cliche thats been around for fifty years...i suggest before you make stupid comment you consider its just possible that i might think they are guilty because of all the police involvement but just for your information..i already stated further down this thread that nobody can help what colour they are or what they look like...and furthermore...i dont read the sunday people..what do you read ??...the sunday sport?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Halibut Posted June 5, 2006 Share Posted June 5, 2006 Further more why did the guy start fighting with the police, steal a gun and fire off a shot? These are not the actions of innocent people mixed up in something they do not understand. And your evidence for these assertions is? Were you there? I think not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SHsheff Posted June 5, 2006 Share Posted June 5, 2006 . Oi! Empty your Inbox! (Apologies to the thread) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anlabystreet Posted June 5, 2006 Author Share Posted June 5, 2006 And your evidence for these assertions is? Were you there? I think not. no and the lawyer wasnt there either ..so wheres her evidence for the assertions Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Halibut Posted June 5, 2006 Share Posted June 5, 2006 no and the lawyer wasnt there either ..so wheres her evidence for the assertions She wasn't but she's spoken to the two guys that were , which puts her in a rather more advantageous position than you to determine the truth of the matter. I wouldn't mind betting that both of your assertions a) that there was a struggle and b) the even more improbable 'stole a gun and fired off a shot' turn out to be completely unfounded. You can quote me on that and if I turn out to be wrong I'll accept it publicly here. If the guy who got shot had his hands on aweapon do you not think the Police would have found it by now. They were there at the scene. Perhaps the guy was a magician as well as an alleged terrorist? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anlabystreet Posted June 5, 2006 Author Share Posted June 5, 2006 She wasn't but she's spoken to the two guys that were , which puts her in a rather more advantageous position than you to determine the truth of the matter. I wouldn't mind betting that both of your assertions a) that there was a struggle and b) the even more improbable 'stole a gun and fired off a shot' turn out to be completely unfounded. You can quote me on that and if I turn out to be wrong I'll accept it publicly here. If the guy who got shot had his hands on aweapon do you not think the Police would have found it by now. They were there at the scene. Perhaps the guy was a magician as well as an alleged terrorist? i dont think just cos she has spoken to them puts her in any position closer to the truth..they might be a pair of liars ..i dont know,maybe they are innocent...but she doent know either...but she makes factual statements saying theyre innocent...and that was the whole point of this thread...it wasnt about innocence or guilt ..it was about her earning her unearned income...and furthermore ..i suggest you challenge the view and not the person Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
artisan Posted June 5, 2006 Share Posted June 5, 2006 She wasn't but she's spoken to the two guys that were , which puts her in a rather more advantageous position than you to determine the truth of the matter. I wouldn't mind betting that both of your assertions a) that there was a struggle and b) the even more improbable 'stole a gun and fired off a shot' turn out to be completely unfounded. You can quote me on that and if I turn out to be wrong I'll accept it publicly here. If the guy who got shot had his hands on aweapon do you not think the Police would have found it by now. They were there at the scene. Perhaps the guy was a magician as well as an alleged terrorist? In the commotion caused it was grappled from a coppers hand and fired, missed his target and shot the injured man. if you have ever been in a scuffle you will know these things happen in an instant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
artisan Posted June 5, 2006 Share Posted June 5, 2006 If you came downstairs at first light and found your house full of policemen, would you start fighting with them? Of course not, so why did these guys, even to the point of pistols being fired. Halibut, you will be fried on this one Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.