Jump to content

Brett kavanaugh - Supreme Court


Guest makapaka

Recommended Posts

in any cabinet, Tory or Labour there will probably be one or two from decidedly non-privileged backgrounds.

 

as far as the top job goes the least privileged prime minsters since 1945 probably were :

 

1. Heath

2. Major

3. Callaghan

 

and most privileged :

 

1. Churchill

2. Douglas Home

3. McMillan

 

in mid-table, the others in descending order of privileged-ness, with the most privileged first, probably

 

1. Cameron

2. Blair

3. May

4. Brown

5. Thatcher

6. Wilson

 

What about Anthony Eden?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

American presidents are somewhat more egalitarian than British Prime Ministers are and are a bit less likely to be from more affluent backgrounds. Since 1945 most privileged to least privileged American presidents :

 

1. Kennedy

2. Bush Jnr.

3. Bush Snr.

4. Trump

5. Eisenhower

6. Carter

7. Truman

8. Johnson

9. Obama

10. Nixon

11. Reagan

12. Clinton

 

---------- Post added 05-10-2018 at 23:40 ----------

 

What about Anthony Eden?

 

one of the Tory toffs for sure who they stopped having as leaders after Heath. Ahead of McMillan but behind Douglas-Home.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

American presidents are somewhat more egalitarian than British Prime Ministers are and are a bit less likely to be from more affluent backgrounds. Since 1945 most privileged to least privileged American presidents :

 

1. Kennedy

2. Bush Jnr.

3. Bush Snr.

4. Trump

5. Eisenhower

6. Carter

7. Truman

8. Johnson

9. Obama

10. Nixon

11. Reagan

12. Clinton

 

---------- Post added 05-10-2018 at 23:40 ----------

 

 

one of the Tory toffs for sure who they stopped having as leaders after Heath. Ahead of McMillan but behind Douglas-Home.

A gangsters lad at the top.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How will you feel if he repeals Roe vs Wade?

 

You keep saying this. You only have to use a tiny little bit of common sense to find out if he would.

 

He has repeatably said that he views this as settled law and would not change it.

 

Even if the absolute worst were to happen in a decade and they repealed it, it would then be left up to individual states to legislate it so you don't have to worry, you would still have your fill of killing little babies. Nothing would change.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No; asking a highly relevant question of one of his supporters.

What would your view be if he succeeds in repealing it?

 

And I repeat you lost the old argument and now you instantly move on to a new argument. I will humour you though and say that he won't repeal it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And I repeat you lost the old argument and now you instantly move on to a new argument. I will humour you though and say that he won't repeal it.

 

You answered a different question. What would your view be in the event that he does?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.