leviathan13 Posted October 6, 2018 Share Posted October 6, 2018 You wouldn't be sticking up for him if it wasn't for his wealth. How does his wealth benefit us??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XXTickerXX Posted October 6, 2018 Share Posted October 6, 2018 For me this is nothing to do with wealth. A bloke went for a job. A lady accused him of something from 30 years ago. He said it didn’t happen. Millions of people found him guilty by trial of social media. So wrong. Hopefully the lady will take it to trial and the truth can be established. Not much chance of that. https://abc7news.com/politics/ford-wont-pursue-allegations-against-kavanaugh-further/4427136/ It's almost like it was a political hit job. They mention impeachment in there. Loads of BS. Alan Morton Dershowitz (Not just a liberal law professor, a professor emeritus at Harvard, and widely viewed as the greatest constitional law mind alive ) says he cannot be impeached for things in the past, only his actions on the Supreme Court. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blake Posted October 7, 2018 Share Posted October 7, 2018 A gangsters lad at the top. it's a myth that - one of those total misconceptions that is repeated so often, that a lot of people believe it to be true. But it isn't. Jack Kennedy's dad Joe P, was a thoroughly horrible person, without a doubt. But he wasn't a gangster or a bootlegger. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Moon Posted October 7, 2018 Share Posted October 7, 2018 I'm glad common sense prevailed and mindless mob rule didn't win the day. We just don't know, and probably never will know what happened, if anything between Brett Kavanaugh and this lady all those years ago, but there has to be proof, there has to be due process or other wise where are we? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ontarian1981 Posted October 7, 2018 Share Posted October 7, 2018 I'm glad common sense prevailed and mindless mob rule didn't win the day. We just don't know, and probably never will know what happened, if anything between Brett Kavanaugh and this lady all those years ago, but there has to be proof, there has to be due process or other wise where are we? It wasn't mindless mob rule, it was calculated political meddling and it backfired, thank god. Of course, the rabble of protesters was more concerned about the #Me Too doctrines than they were about justice and the law. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hobinfoot Posted October 7, 2018 Share Posted October 7, 2018 What has this man done? 1) if he's guilty lock him up 2) if he's isn't then let him get on with the job 3) but there shouldn't be trial by media 4) if this lady has got evidence then she should produce it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K1Machine Posted October 7, 2018 Share Posted October 7, 2018 Congrats to Brett Kavanaugh. Thankfully those disgusting lies and smear tactics didnt work in the end and he is able to take his rightful position. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeffrey Shaw Posted October 9, 2018 Share Posted October 9, 2018 Either way, and no matter who was in law correct: a. the complainant never pressed criminal charges; so b. the accused is of necessity Not Guilty; and c. it beggars belief that USA politics has no arguments on policies but merely on personalities. It makes the UK Parliamentary system- and even its Political Party leaders- look like exemplars of correct and rational debate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magilla Posted October 11, 2018 Share Posted October 11, 2018 What has this man done? 1) if he's guilty lock him up 2) if he's isn't then let him get on with the job 3) but there shouldn't be trial by media 4) if this lady has got evidence then she should produce it Denouncing Democrats for violating the sacred tenet that someone is innocent until proven guilty, Trump led the crowd in a chant of "Lock her up!" for a person who has never been charged with a crime. ... that was *after* the evidence had been produced and showed no crime had been comitted Hmmmm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
samonosuke Posted November 3, 2018 Share Posted November 3, 2018 Looks like the anti Kavanaugh mob will have something to talk about - https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2018/11/02/brett-kavanaugh-accuser-referred-fbi-doj-investigation/1863210002/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now