SnailyBoy Posted October 14, 2018 Share Posted October 14, 2018 Not when they come from idiots who will not listen when you give them an answer they dont like.Lets set the record straight once and for all, i do not support discrimination but have the right to work,or not, for anyone i choose to ,end of. Good for you. However you weren't talking about your right to work, you were making a general point about refusal of service for any reason. You see how discrimination will fall into that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hots on Posted October 14, 2018 Share Posted October 14, 2018 Good for you. However you weren't talking about your right to work, you were making a general point about refusal of service for any reason. You see how discrimination will fall into that? A few years back there was a Muslim woman who worked in a pharmacy that refused to serve someone a morning after pill; I seem to remember lefty do-gooder types saying things like "other chemists are available" and so on. Funny how that reasoning doesn't apply here isn't it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Penistone999 Posted October 14, 2018 Author Share Posted October 14, 2018 Good for you. However you weren't talking about your right to work, you were making a general point about refusal of service for any reason. You see how discrimination will fall into that? Not at all. If a business owner is not comfortable serving or selling to someone for whatever reason, a simple " we are not offering that product for sale right now " puts and end to the issue. What has happened with the "Gay Cake " is someone took offence about a refusal to supply a product the business owner didnt want to provide , when then was nothing what so ever to be offended about. He should have just gone elsewhere to source the cake he wanted instead of finding discrimination where there wasnt any. The real ones to blame here are the idiotic morons who decided to take it to court in the first place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnailyBoy Posted October 14, 2018 Share Posted October 14, 2018 Not at all. If a business owner is not comfortable serving or selling to someone for whatever reason, a simple " we are not offering that product for sale right now " puts and end to the issue. What has happened with the "Gay Cake " is someone took offence about a refusal to supply a product the business owner didnt want to provide , when then was nothing what so ever to be offended about. He should have just gone elsewhere to source the cake he wanted instead of finding discrimination where there wasnt any. The real ones to blame here are the idiotic morons who decided to take it to court in the first place. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-15811223 Discrimination Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Penistone999 Posted October 14, 2018 Author Share Posted October 14, 2018 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-15811223 Discrimination As i have just said , if the owners had simply said they had no vacancies, this wouldnt have ended up in court., no matter what their reasons were for refusing the blokes a room. A little bit naive form the hotel owners for not going down the " No Vacancies " route . ---------- Post added 14-10-2018 at 15:09 ---------- https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-15811223 Discrimination There was NO discrimination in the Gay Cake case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hots on Posted October 14, 2018 Share Posted October 14, 2018 There are plenty of establishments, B&B's, cake shops, dress makers, wedding shops etc, that are owned and run by Muslims and afro carribbean's, most of whom probably would take issue with producing something with a gay theme, but these militant gay groups don't go after them do they, they leave them well alone and ONLY seem to want to pick fights with white Christian establishments, and you've got to ask yourself why that is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnailyBoy Posted October 14, 2018 Share Posted October 14, 2018 As i have just said , if the owners had simply said they had no vacancies, this wouldnt have ended up in court., no matter what their reasons were for refusing the blokes a room. A little bit naive form the hotel owners for not going down the " No Vacancies " route . Yeah, I guess lying is a good way of getting out of most awkward situations, until you get unstuck. There was NO discrimination in the Gay Cake case. I didn't say there was :roll: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hots on Posted October 14, 2018 Share Posted October 14, 2018 Discrimination is in human nature, we all do it in all sorts of ways more than we care to admit, we all choose to associate with and who not to, who we invite to our houses and who we don't and so on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the_bloke Posted October 14, 2018 Share Posted October 14, 2018 There are plenty of establishments, B&B's, cake shops, dress makers, wedding shops etc, that are owned and run by Muslims and afro carribbean's, most of whom probably would take issue with producing something with a gay theme, but these militant gay groups don't go after them do they, they leave them well alone and ONLY seem to want to pick fights with white Christian establishments, and you've got to ask yourself why that is. Something like this, after a furore about a very similar cake-case in the US? https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/apr/3/video-muslim-bakers-points-double-standard-gay-wed/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Top Cats Hat Posted October 14, 2018 Share Posted October 14, 2018 A few years back there was a Muslim woman who worked in a pharmacy that refused to serve someone a morning after pill; I seem to remember lefty do-gooder types saying things like "other chemists are available" and so on. Really? Are you sure that you have that right and they were not right wing do-gooders? No one claiming to be 'left wing' would ever put someone's religious views over a woman's reproductive rights! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts