Jump to content

The Royal Family Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, West 77 said:

You do know this is a civil case?  You do know that nobody in the UK can be extradited to a foreign country to answer a civil case?

 

Everyone including Prince Andrew is innocent until proven guilty.   A civil case is not the same as a criminal case which is why the media and people can get away with making all sorts of comments and assumptions to discredit an individual.

Guilty or not, the damage has been done. 

 Even if he manages to dodge a trial / hearing, a cloud will always hang over his head, not least because he failed to  cooperate with the Americans, and that disasterous interview.

I very much doubt he will ever be able to return to public duties.

Edited by Anna B
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, PRESLEY said:

West 77 reckons Andrew is an innocent man,  mixed up with a group of pedo's and a photo around the young girl,  come on West, stop it your making yourself sound ridiculous. :roll:

....... a "young girl" who was well over the legal age of consent in most countries around the world at the time the photograph of taken. A photograph which hardly displays a image of someone being there by way of fear, enforcement, entrapment or reluctance.  A young girl who was previously caught out giving dubious evidence on other similar cases. A young girl who is clearly chasing the money more than prepared to sign big fat non disclosure settlement agreements rather than getting to the truth. A young girl who is a master in manipulating the media for her next compensatory payout from easy high profile targets.  A young girl who has not provided a single shred of any credible evidence to these allegations.

 

This is a civil compensatory claim. Let's get that simple fact out there.  Let's all stop with this ridiculous notion that there is some book to be thrown or some jail cell just waiting or PC Plod around the corner ready to charge in to arrest him.  

 

She's after nothing more than a big fat cheque.

Edited by ECCOnoob
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ECCOnoob said:

....... a "young girl" who was well over the legal age of consent in most countries around the world at the time the photograph of taken. A young girl who was previously caught out giving dubious evidence on other similar cases. A young girl who is clearly chasing the money more than prepared to sign big fat non disclosure settlement agreements rather than getting to the truth. A young girl who is a master in manipulating the media for her next compensatory payout from easy high profile targets.  A young girl who has not provided a single shred of any credible evidence to these allegations.

 

This is a civil compensatory claim. Let's get that simple fact out there.  Let's all stop with this ridiculous notion that there is some book to be thrown or some jail cell just waiting or PC Plod around the corner ready to charge in to arrest him.  

 

She's after nothing more than a big fat cheque.

A " young girl " who accepted  a settlement of 500,000 dollars from a Billionaire  . Wonder why ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, hackey lad said:

Why such a small settlement ?

Well I can only speak from my day job experience..... but generally when I get the inkling a claimant is only in it for easy money you know how many carrots to dangle before they snatch your hands off.

 

In other words when some chancer comes along it's cheaper to pay them off than spending money fighting it.

Edited by ECCOnoob
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, cuttsie said:

Was he married to that ginger Royal at the time . 

Perhaps the photo where he has his hand around that lass is a fake .

And maybe it was just a look a like of Andrew,  come on now!   If Andrew would have just said yes I did go to a club with her and yes that is me putting my arm  around her as we were  having  a photo taken doesn't mean he slept with her, thats what a lot of people do, I have done this many times at weddings and at numerous social events with freinds,  to get everybody in on the pic being taken'   people huddle together by putting arms  around shoulders or backs, this doesn't mean because on the photo I have had my arm around a mate or his wife I have slept with her or him even,  :hihi:   but for Andrew to say I can't recall the girl in the photo and can't recall  going to a club with her is complete  garbage,  the lie then leaves him wide open . Why lie if you have nothing to hide.  I really think this idiot has got in with the wrong  people and got carried a long on  the wave  and got into a hole he is finding hard to get out of,  for me now it's a case of is is he a Perv or just naive.  The same as when he was knockin  the Porn Star off, Koo Stark,  again was he seduced or just a seedy perv.  :suspect:    it all begs a lot of self inflicted questions,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.