The Royal Family Discussion Thread

[hackey lad]

2 minutes ago, makapaka said:

More victim blaming. Excellent.

 

Who is to blame for her death ?

[ECCOnoob]

50 minutes ago, makapaka said:

I always say to people when they go to Paris - don’t be living it up or you’ll end up dead……

 

this whole post reads like some deranged rant in support of the “good” royals. 

Not really.  I have no issues with the monarchy  but I'm hardly showing derranged support for them either.  I was not exactly a massive fan of Diana but didn't want to see her dead either....     

 

What I am doing is strongly countering the seemingly frequent attempts to portray Diana as if she was this sweet, angelic, wholly innocent person who was continually bullied, played upon and ill-treated by her evil husband and the rest of the nasty royal family. 

 

I am countering this nonsense that she was the victim who was plagued by the paparazzi and singled out despite the fact that she very obviously and manipulatively courted such attention and used it very much for her advantage when it's suited to her.  

 

I am also simply countering these ludicrous theories and conspiracies that somehow she was murdered at the hands of senior roles when it was very clear her death was caused by a drunk driver.

Edited June 5, 2022 by ECCOnoob

[Guest makapaka]

7 minutes ago, hackey lad said:

Who is to blame for her death ?

What you asking me for - living it up in Paris apparently?

3 minutes ago, ECCOnoob said:

Not really.  I have no issues with the monarchy but I'm hardly showing derranged support for them either....     

 

What I am doing is strongly countering  attempts to portray Diana as if she was this sweets, angelic, wholly innocent person who wa continually bullied, played upon and ill-treated by her evil husband and the rest of the nasty royal family. 

 

I am countering this nonsense that she was the victim who was plagued by the paparazzi and singled out despite the fact that she very obviously and manipulatively courted such a attention and used it very much for her advantage when it's suited to her. 

 

I am also simply countering these Ludacris theories and conspiracies that somehow she was murdered at the hands of senior roles when it was very clear her death was caused by a drunk driver.

I don’t care either way - but am interested how you have such an insight.

 

where are you getting your information from?

 

is it the same place from which you  form your judgement on the rest of the royal family?

Edited June 5, 2022 by makapaka

[hackey lad]

1 minute ago, makapaka said:

What you asking me for - living it up in Paris apparently?

Another question on yet another thread  avoided 

[Rockers rule]

4 hours ago, ECCOnoob said:

No, a young woman and mother lost her life because she was living it up around Paris and was escaping the Press she courtered by jumping into  a car with an (albeit unknown) drunk driver.

 

A car crash in the tunnel being controlled by a drunk chauffeur is what killed Diana. That's it. Take the tin foil hat off.

 

Charles may have been having an affair with his old flame, but let's not make out that she was Mrs Innocent. *cough ginger harry*.  I certainly never bought into the 'people's princess' nonsense. They all have their elements of philanthropy, patriotism and charity work. She was not alone in that, she just was better at manipulating the tablpid press to make her look good and all the others look like terrible establishment bullies.

 

Don't be fooled by it. She was a Sloaney through and through. She was just as establishment as they were. She was well and truly within the County Set and if not bagging a Royal it woulf have been somebody on similar levels and standing. Just because they are very posh dining at Langhams Brasserie and shopping in Peter Jones doesn't mean they can't shag around and do the mating dance any less than Tracy the Tart from Essex.

Hello ECCOnoob.

No tin foil hat on here Ecco and certainly never fooled with that 'peoples princess' rubbish.

I didn't illuminate on Diana's behind the scene shenanigans for exactly that reason, they are all well documented.

I'll stand by my post.

How Camila dare look into the eyes of Harry, William or any of the grandkids without fearing one of them won't tip her over the balcony one day shows how thick skinned she is.

 

Keep safe and long live the Queen  .

[Guest makapaka]

Just now, hackey lad said:

Another question on yet another thread  avoided 

What - you want me to give you an answer on who was responsible for Diana’s murder?
 

Car crash wasn’t it. Drunk driver. There you go. 
 

i thought everyone knew that. 
 

or cos she was living it up in Paris? 

[hackey lad]

3 minutes ago, makapaka said:

What - you want me to give you an answer on who was responsible for Diana’s murder?
 

Car crash wasn’t it. Drunk driver. There you go. 
 

i thought everyone knew that. 
 

or cos she was living it up in Paris? 

Well done . By the way  , not murder 

Edited June 5, 2022 by hackey lad

[Guest makapaka]

6 minutes ago, hackey lad said:

Well done . By the way  , not murder 

I meant death.

[ECCOnoob]

6 minutes ago, makapaka said:

What you asking me for - living it up in Paris apparently?

I don’t care either way - but am interested how you have such an insight.

 

where are you getting your information from?

 

is it the same place from which you  form your judgement on the rest of the royal family?

What information do you refer to?   You mean the widely publicly available info about her upbringing and background and families to the point she met and married prince Charles? Do you mean the very widely and publicly available inquest and police investigations, discussions and reporting into the cause of death in Paris? Do you mean her widely publicised affairs during the marriage and relationships afterwards? Do you mean her widely reported tensions with the media, selected tell-all interviews and biographical books that she chose to engage with? 

 

I'm hardly forming my opinion on lots of wild speculation and theory. I look beyond just some headline or soundbite. I read up on things and take interest.  My thoughts are certainly a damn sight more credible than people throwing out accusations that the Queen murdered her. 

[Guest makapaka]

Just now, ECCOnoob said:

What information do you refer to?   You mean the widely publicly available info about her upbringing and background and families to the point she met and married prince Charles? Do you mean the very widely and publicly available inquest and police investigations, discussions and reporting into the cause of death in Paris? Do you mean her widely publicised affairs during the marriage and relationships afterwards? Do you mean her widely reported tensions with the media, selected tell-all interviews and biographical books that she chose to engage with? 

 

I'm hardly forming my opinion on lots of wild speculation and theory. I look beyond just some headline or soundbite. I read up on things and take interest.  My thoughts are certainly a damn sight more credible than people throwing out accusations that the Queen murdered her. 

I don’t believe she was murdered. 
 

have you done the same level of research on the rest of the royal family?