Delbow Posted September 12, 2022 Share Posted September 12, 2022 1 minute ago, HumbleNarrator said: It was in Scotland. 🤣 Oxford is not in Scotland. God, you are thick aren't you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harvey19 Posted September 12, 2022 Share Posted September 12, 2022 10 minutes ago, L00b said: In England & Wales, police can only arrest for Breach of the Peace if there is a threat of violence. Where the threat comes from someone responding to the protest, an arrest of the person protesting can only be justified in exceptional circumstances. As always, get your facts right first. Then form an opinion. That’s how reasonable members of the public ‘work’. Certainly should, at any rate. Read what I wrote again and please try to be civil it costs nothing. 6 minutes ago, Delbow said: I am genuinely upset, annoyed and angry that there are Tories. Can I have them all arrested for breach of the peace? You can put it on your wish list Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Delbow Posted September 12, 2022 Share Posted September 12, 2022 3 minutes ago, HumbleNarrator said: I thought we were talking about the woman arrested in Edinburgh https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/royals/andrew-marr-slams-police-after-27969095 Oxford is referenced in the very first paragraph of the article I linked to. London is also referenced further down, with someone being arrested for holding a sign saying "not my king". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
L00b Posted September 12, 2022 Share Posted September 12, 2022 (edited) 15 minutes ago, harvey19 said: Read what I wrote again and please try to be civil it costs nothing. 32 minutes ago, harvey19 said: They were picking a time to cause most impact and publicity by doing it just after Charles mother had died. It was obvious many people would be upset, annoyed and angry by such behaviour at such a time and therefore the police will have arrested them for conduct liable to cause a breach of the peace Now, your turn to read what I wrote again… …so, where was the threat of violence, again? The Oxford protester was not arrested, according to the Police. Just asked to move away from the gates, to allow passage of vehicles. Much ado about nothing, that one. That Scottish one, now that’s a different kettle of fish. But then, Public Order Law is different up there. Basically, the offense is whatever the Police says (-happened). Still, the protester should get off under the HRA. If the case even makes it to a Court, that is…between the stupidity of the arrest, PO case law and it’s resilience to HRA, the barristers strike, the defunded CJS, <etc> Edited September 12, 2022 by L00b Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
L00b Posted September 12, 2022 Share Posted September 12, 2022 (edited) 10 minutes ago, HumbleNarrator said: Haha, up yours Delbow, in your face. Are you 10? 🙄 Delbow’s link which Harvey was responding and set his conversation to, is about the Oxford arrest. The thread is plenty clear on that, incontrovertible. The recent Police statement that I alluded to, about ‘not an arrest’, is about the Westminster one alleged this morning, not the Oxford one, my bad: Hey, you wish to stoke civil disturbances and disobedience, and republicanism? Just carry on strong-arming peaceful protesters like that 😏 Edited September 12, 2022 by L00b Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hackey lad Posted September 12, 2022 Share Posted September 12, 2022 54 minutes ago, Mister M said: I'm glad I'm not the only one. I know people grieve differently, and I wouldn't want to say categorically that it's wrong; but I don't know, it just doesn't sit right with me for some reason. Just to add , I was on about the Queen . I have seen a few members of my family at rest . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hackey lad Posted September 12, 2022 Share Posted September 12, 2022 1 hour ago, HumbleNarrator said: You are not getting it. Very young children cannot be left home alone while to "play" while their parents are out at work. What is he not getting ? Its common knowledge you can't leave underage children home alone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Delayed Posted September 12, 2022 Share Posted September 12, 2022 1 minute ago, HumbleNarrator said: He (and others) didn't seem to want to acknowledge that many working people, who's jobs may not be closed on the day, will have an issue with child care. Chances are they won't. Family members and friends that are off could act has baby sitters for a day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Delayed Posted September 12, 2022 Share Posted September 12, 2022 (edited) Just now, HumbleNarrator said: You can't just assume that's the case for everyone. I wouldn't want someone's kids foisted on me on that day. So why can you assume that people will have a problem for one day, just because you wouldn't like it? Edited September 12, 2022 by Delayed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Delayed Posted September 12, 2022 Share Posted September 12, 2022 Just now, HumbleNarrator said: It is a fact that some will. So it's also a fact that some won't Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now