Baron99 Posted August 18, 2018 Author Share Posted August 18, 2018 Apparently, Eugenie herself has a net wealth of £3.2 million. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
muddycoffee Posted August 18, 2018 Share Posted August 18, 2018 In her defence, not that I have met her or could recognise her in a crowd, while she takes no money from the privy purse, she earns a salary from working as a director of an art gallery which is entirely reasonable for a woman with a BA Degree. She also does unpaid work for a series of charities and she has represented Prince Andrew and the queen at official engagements. So while I am not standing up to justify spending 2 million on her wedding, to say "She carries no royal functions, no useful purpose " is incorrect. I bet there are other royal hangers on that do a lot less than this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ontarian1981 Posted August 18, 2018 Share Posted August 18, 2018 Seeing as how Southerners, Londoners in particular, love the royals so much let them pay for the security out of their municipal taxes. After all, it will be those folks who will be the ones lining the streets to see the show. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vaati Posted August 18, 2018 Share Posted August 18, 2018 The bickering, name calling and off topic has been removed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest makapaka Posted August 18, 2018 Share Posted August 18, 2018 It’s outrageous. A disgrace in fact and proof that they really do take the rest of us for mugs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ms Macbeth Posted August 18, 2018 Share Posted August 18, 2018 Then it ought to have been a consideration when she was planning where to get married. Does she really need to parade all around Windsor in a horse and carriage? Policing that route must have doubled the security bill. Why not follow Zara Phillips example, a small wedding in a country church in Scotland. My thoughts exactly. However Princess Anne brought her children up very differently to Prince Andrew, she's much more down to earth. Zara and Peter Phillips although privileged, had no titles. The two princesses however have, IMO, been encouraged to feel entitled. Not the most attractive trait. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
St Petre Posted August 18, 2018 Share Posted August 18, 2018 Perhaps some of those receiving exaggerated family benefits could be asked to contribute ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anna B Posted August 18, 2018 Share Posted August 18, 2018 (edited) In her defence, not that I have met her or could recognise her in a crowd, while she takes no money from the privy purse, she earns a salary from working as a director of an art gallery which is entirely reasonable for a woman with a BA Degree. She also does unpaid work for a series of charities and she has represented Prince Andrew and the queen at official engagements. So while I am not standing up to justify spending 2 million on her wedding, to say "She carries no royal functions, no useful purpose " is incorrect. I bet there are other royal hangers on that do a lot less than this. Apart from holidays (I think it was 14 last year,) what work does she actually do in her job as 'director of an art gallery' that justifies a salary of £3.2 million? I know lots of people with BA degrees. Not one of them earns £3.2 million. In fact quite a few of them have been unable to get any work at all in their field. She is where she is purely because she is HRH. Edited August 18, 2018 by Anna B Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ez8004 Posted August 18, 2018 Share Posted August 18, 2018 Apart from holidays (I think it was 14 last year,) what work does she actually do in her job as 'director of an art gallery' that justifies a salary of £3.2 million? I know lots of people with BA degrees. Not one of them earns £3.2 million. In fact quite a few of them have been unable to get any work at all in their field. She is where she is purely because she is HRH. And the problem is what exactly? If you're stupid enough to get into a field where connections are required to be successful and you have none, then whose fault is that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ontarian1981 Posted August 18, 2018 Share Posted August 18, 2018 Apart from holidays (I think it was 14 last year,) what work does she actually do in her job as 'director of an art gallery' that justifies a salary of £3.2 million? I know lots of people with BA degrees. Not one of them earns £3.2 million. In fact quite a few of them have been unable to get any work at all in their field. She is where she is purely because she is HRH. She has a net wealth of 3.2 million not an annual salary of it. In other words, she is worth 3.2 million in all assets, including her home, and cash But I know exactly what you mean and I too question why she should be worth that much anyways, It is all obviously "family" money given or inherited. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now