The Royal Family Discussion Thread

[Mister Gee]

1 minute ago, *_ash_* said:

The other thing that comes to mind, is the new popular fashion of pumping that s*** into one's lips. 

 

It just looks repulsive to me. I know it's people's own choice and subjective, but it's really not a good look. 

Da what?

[*_ash_*]

Just now, Mister Gee said:

Da what?

The fish lips look. I would throw that in room 101 

[Waldo]

11 minutes ago, Mister Gee said:

What would the other one be?

I’m waiting for a reply from the organ grinder, I’m not reight bothered what one of his monkeys thinks.

Ooof, like a barbed arrow to my heart!

[ECCOnoob]

2 minutes ago, Mister Gee said:

12 million quid from his mother sort to that.

Commercial settlement with no admission of any liability.  A reasonable and common consideration for any high-profile accused which will be considered by any well-trained lawyer.

 

The alleged victim could have stuck by a principles. She was the one who wanted "justice" so badly. She wanted her day in court so the "truth" could be heard.  If she had the "solid evidence" she claimed, why did she do it. But we all know what she really wanted and she got it. Tick tock tick tock before she moves on to the next high profile person with more allegations.

[Waldo]

6 minutes ago, The_DADDY said:

I used to think that but now I feel the situation is more sinister. The more I see of them together the more convinced I am Domestic abuse/Coercive control is a factor.

You suspect Meghan is coercively controlling Harry?

[The_DADDY]

1 minute ago, Waldo said:

You suspect Meghan is coercively controlling Harry?

I do think it's a possibility yes.

[Mister Gee]

1 minute ago, ECCOnoob said:

Commercial settlement with no admission of any liability.  A reasonable and common consideration for any high-profile accused which will be considered by any well-trained lawyer.

 

The alleged victim could have stuck by a principles. She was the one who wanted "justice" so badly. She wanted her day in court so the "truth" could be heard.  If she had the "solid evidence" she claimed, why did she do it. But we all know what she really wanted and she got it. Tick tock tick tock before she moves on to the next high profile person with more allegations.

Jeez,  you’re even creepier than I thought.

[Waldo]

Just now, The_DADDY said:

I do think it's a possibility yes.

Hard to judge I guess; possible, but there's so much that happens behind closed doors, that we're just not aware of.

 

My gut feeling is she's very manipulative and intentional in the way she presents (spins and lies) things, in order to cultivate a particular image for herself. If she wasn't so self-obsessed, perhaps she'd care less what others' think of her? I dunno; I'm not a psychologist, I'm only a monkey!

[Guest sibon]

6 minutes ago, ECCOnoob said:

Commercial settlement with no admission of any liability.  A reasonable and common consideration for any high-profile accused which will be considered by any well-trained lawyer.

 

The alleged victim could have stuck by a principles. She was the one who wanted "justice" so badly. She wanted her day in court so the "truth" could be heard.  If she had the "solid evidence" she claimed, why did she do it. But we all know what she really wanted and she got it. Tick tock tick tock before she moves on to the next high profile person with more allegations.

That’s absolutely correct.

 

And exactly how the rest of the world sees it🙄

[Waldo]

3 minutes ago, Mister Gee said:

Jeez,  you’re even creepier than I thought.

Yeah yeah, but have you got any bananas?