The Royal Family Discussion Thread

[Guest makapaka]

 

[harvey19]

4 minutes ago, The_DADDY said:

Double standards much 🙄

Out of interest, why?

I still do not think you understand what I have written. No double standards at all. If Andrew had been cashiered from the R.N. he would not r be allowed to wear uniform which would be right  but he was not and nothing has been alleged about any misbehaviour whilst serving.

Surely you understand my point now.

 

If Jimmy Saville committed crimes he should not be excused because of his charity work.

 

[The_DADDY]

Just now, harvey19 said:

I still do not think you understand what I have written.

 

Yes I do.

[harvey19]

Just now, The_DADDY said:

Yes I do.

Oh no you don't !

[altus]

16 minutes ago, harvey19 said:

What is your question ?

Let me make things easier for you to understand my point about the wearing of uniform.

Andrew served his Queen and Country bravely in a war.

He was honourably discharged from the R.N.

I have said several times that I am asking if he should have the privilege of wearing uniform (which has been granted) regardless of future allegations against him after he had left the R.N. and allegedly happened  long after he had left the R.N.

Now please understand that is the question.

Would his actions and the publicity surrounding them after he left the service mean his wearing the uniform at a high profile public event be an embarrassment to the R.N.?

 

I know you want to disassociate his actions from wearing the uniform but I don't think you can.

[The_DADDY]

1 minute ago, harvey19 said:

 No double standards at all. If Andrew had been cashiered from the R.N. he would not r be allowed to wear uniform which would be right  but he was not and nothing has been alleged about any misbehaviour whilst serving.

Surely you understand my point now.

 

 

I understood it right away thanks. It's a ludicrous position to take.

He was a good boy whilst serving in the forces so his behavior after he left is of no consequence. 

Like I said earlier. Get help.

1 minute ago, harvey19 said:

Oh no you don't !

It's not quite pantomime season yet so I'll ignore this.........

[harvey19]

1 minute ago, The_DADDY said:

I understood it right away thanks. It's a ludicrous position to take.

He was a good boy whilst serving in the forces so his behavior after he left is of no consequence. 

Like I said earlier. Get help.

It's not quite pantomime season yet so I'll ignore this.........

I think you are the one that needs help if you can not still discuss the relevant point.

Why do you think he has now been allowed to wear uniform ?

[The_DADDY]

Just now, harvey19 said:

I think you are the one that needs help if you can not still discuss the relevant point.

 

Sweet, what help do you suggest I get?

Just now, harvey19 said:

Why do you think he has now been allowed to wear uniform ?

Who knows? Perhaps, like you the royal family don't care about trafficked girls being used for sex by dirty old men and are willing to ignore the convicted nonces Andy hung out with?

[harvey19]

4 minutes ago, altus said:

Would his actions and the publicity surrounding them after he left the service mean his wearing the uniform at a high profile public event be an embarrassment to the R.N.?

 

I know you want to disassociate his actions from wearing the uniform but I don't think you can.

Thank you for trying to debate the issue.

I think it could cause embarrassment but as he had an unblemished record and nothing proved against him in his later life I think that is why he has been allowed to wear uniform.

[PRESLEY]

3 minutes ago, harvey19 said:

Thank you for trying to debate the issue.

I think it could cause embarrassment but as he had an unblemished record and nothing proved against him in his later life I think that is why he has been allowed to wear uniform.

Is it fitting for a member of the Royal Family to go with a Porn Star.