Jump to content

The Royal Family Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, harvey19 said:

Thank you for trying to debate the issue.

I think it could cause embarrassment but as he had an unblemished record and nothing proved against him in his later life I think that is why he has been allowed to wear uniform.

Neither did savile yet you don't feel he deserves forgiveness. 

Like I said earlier, double standards.

Edited by The_DADDY
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, harvey19 said:

Thank you for trying to debate the issue.

I think it could cause embarrassment but as he had an unblemished record and nothing proved against him in his later life I think that is why he has been allowed to wear uniform.

The Queens / Taxpayers money put a stop to anything being proven.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, The_DADDY said:

Sweet, what help do you suggest I get?

Who knows? Perhaps, like you the royal family don't care about trafficked girls being used for sex by dirty old men and are willing to ignore the convicted nonces Andy hung out with?

I do not condone anything Andrew is accused of as I have explained to you several times.

You need help in understanding posts.

You have no answer why Andrew was allowed to wear uniform or give it any real thought.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, The_DADDY said:

Neither did savile yet you don't feel he deserves forgiveness. 

Like I said early, double standards.

Jimmy Saville was never in the forces and so the question of wearing uniform never came up.

11 minutes ago, PRESLEY said:

Is it fitting for a member of the Royal Family to go with a Porn Star. 

What has this got to do with wearing a uniform ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, harvey19 said:

Thank you for trying to debate the issue.

I think it could cause embarrassment but as he had an unblemished record and nothing proved against him in his later life I think that is why he has been allowed to wear uniform.

Proven or not, I think he has let his mother down big time and caused her an awful lot of stress in her final years.

If it's true he was her favourite son' I think that was unforgivable.  IMO he's an arrogant narcissist, with very few redeeming features. I think Charles regards him as a liability, so will not want him bringing down the Royal 'brand.' 

Edited by Anna B
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Anna B said:

Proven or not, I think he has let his mother down big time and caused her an awful lot of stress in her final years.

If it's true he was her favourite son' I think that was unforgivable.  IMO he's an arrogant narcissist, with very few redeeming features. I think Charles regards him as a liability, so will not want him bringing down the Royal 'brand.' 

At last a sensible post !

I can not agree or disagree with you about his character but think his mother would have been proud of his military service and that is probably why he  has been allowed to wear it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.