Mossway Posted January 25, 2022 Share Posted January 25, 2022 On 17/01/2022 at 20:52, Rockers rule said: The Ripper book 'the final solution' by Stephen Knight covers the whole Walter Sickert / Albert Victor, royal family connection and is as conspiracy's go one of the better 'who was Jack the Ripper books. At one stage I lived in Snettisham - just a few miles north of Sandringham- and there was a pub there called the Albert Victor ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rockers rule Posted January 25, 2022 Share Posted January 25, 2022 There has been talks of certain 'Duke of York' public houses being re named. There was talks of The Duke of York stakes horse race, run since 1895 also changing its name. Its now going to be called 'The nothing to do with the ostracised Duke of York stakes' . Keep safe out there . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hackey lad Posted February 15, 2022 Share Posted February 15, 2022 Predictable outcome . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
geared Posted February 15, 2022 Share Posted February 15, 2022 Paid off to make it all go away, but aren't there more accusers? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Delbow Posted February 15, 2022 Share Posted February 15, 2022 Where's the payment coming from? Are we just paying his nonce hush money through taxation? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Delbow Posted February 15, 2022 Share Posted February 15, 2022 13 minutes ago, West 77 said: I guess Prince Andrew's mother will be helping out with the payment. No liability has been admitted which normally happens in this type of civil case meaning there is no justification to label him a nonce. At the end of the day the women got what she wanted which was money. The money isn't going to her, as I understand it. I guess one's perspective depends on the extent to which one judges a person by the company they keep. I think that a man who has kept such close company with convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein and convicted under age sex trafficker for the convicted paedophile, Ghislaine Maxwell, has sh*t their pot full on that score. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mister M Posted February 15, 2022 Share Posted February 15, 2022 33 minutes ago, West 77 said: I guess Prince Andrew's mother will be helping out with the payment. No liability has been admitted which normally happens in this type of civil case meaning there is no justification to label him a nonce. At the end of the day the women got what she wanted which was money. Defending Boris Johnson and 'Prince' Andrew. You can't half pick 'em Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hackey lad Posted February 15, 2022 Share Posted February 15, 2022 21 minutes ago, Delbow said: The money isn't going to her, as I understand it. I guess one's perspective depends on the extent to which one judges a person by the company they keep. I think that a man who has kept such close company with convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein and convicted under age sex trafficker for the convicted paedophile, Ghislaine Maxwell, has sh*t their pot full on that score. It is Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ECCOnoob Posted February 15, 2022 Share Posted February 15, 2022 2 hours ago, geared said: Paid off to make it all go away, but aren't there more accusers? Or the alternative is, she was just after the money as predicted. So much for getting to the truth, getting her side of the story out there, getting all this so-called evidence disclosed.. Well done love, you've done it again, another easy target with a public reputation to damage, another easy cheque without any credible evidence tested before a court.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hackey lad Posted February 15, 2022 Share Posted February 15, 2022 2 minutes ago, ECCOnoob said: Or the alternative is, she was just after the money as predicted. So much for getting to the truth, getting her side of the story out there, getting all this so-called evidence disclosed.. Well done love, you've done it again, another easy target with a public reputation to damage, another easy cheque without any credible evidence tested before a court.. Got to agree with you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now