The Royal Family Discussion Thread

[PRESLEY]

How anybody can think this bloke is innocent is madness,  he was naive and  kept bad company my backside,   he was  involved and  aware of every thing going off around him with Epstein,  he just didn't call round to Epsteins for the odd cuppa and a chat for ten minuets once a blue moon.  Paying someone off shows guilt, hush money, flippinhell, I knew from the start he would squirm his way out.  Slimey Toad.

[Cyclecar]

as in

[Dromedary]

4 minutes ago, Cyclecar said:

as in

The one on the left definitely looks photoshopped and badly done at that!

[altus]

2 minutes ago, Cyclecar said:

as in

Now prove the image on the left isn't the edited one. That right arm, i.e. the one that only appears in the left image, looks a more uniform colour than her other arm. Bit strange that.

[ECCOnoob]

9 minutes ago, altus said:

Now prove the image on the left isn't the edited one. That right arm, i.e. the one that only appears in the left image, looks a more uniform colour than her other arm. Bit strange that.

If only there could be an independent party and judicial process  which could have assessed and come to a determination on such contention.

 

Clearly we will never know now that little miss 'victim' has chosen to take the money instead of continuing her so-called quest for the truth and justice.   

[hackey lad]

Just now, ECCOnoob said:

If only there could be an independent party and judicial process  which could have assessed and come to a determination on such contention.

 

Clearly we will never know now that little miss 'victim' has chosen to take the money instead of continuing her so-called quest for the truth and justice.   

[altus]

1 minute ago, ECCOnoob said:

If only there could be an independent party and judicial process  which could have assessed and come to a determination on such contention.

 

Clearly we will never know now that little miss 'victim' has chosen to take the money instead of continuing her so-called quest for the truth and justice.   

Indeed. Clearly we will never know now that the prince has chosen to pay off the victim instead of continuing his so-called quest for the truth and justice. See, that sort of accusation works both ways.

[ECCOnoob]

58 minutes ago, PRESLEY said:

How anybody can think this bloke is innocent is madness,  he was naive and  kept bad company my backside,   he was  involved and  aware of every thing going off around him with Epstein,  he just didn't call round to Epsteins for the odd cuppa and a chat for ten minuets once a blue moon.  Paying someone off shows guilt, hush money, flippinhell, I knew from the start he would squirm his way out.  Slimey Toad.

People don't need to think. He is innocent. Not a single criminal charge has been made against him and not a single court of law has found him guilty. 

 

The only case which went anywhere near a court door was for civil monetary damages, which, much your disappointment, has fizzled away to no fault and no liability found.

 

That's it. Shows over. Under the rule of law he is as innocent as before any of this circus started.  People I'm sure we'll keep thinking whatever but the fact is commercial settlement it's just that. A financially beneficial decision in the party making it.

 

The old washerwomen and hysterical Media will have to find something else to gossip about now. 

 

Edited February 15, 2022 by ECCOnoob

[ECCOnoob]

1 minute ago, altus said:

Indeed. Clearly we will never know now that the prince has chosen to pay off the victim instead of continuing his so-called quest for the truth and justice. See, that sort of accusation works both ways.

Except, only one side of the parties was the one demanding Justice, demanding the truth must come out demanding a voice must be heard.

 

I think you will find the prince maintained denial of the accusations and had no liability right from the start of all this..... and guess what, that's exactly what the outcome has been.

 

Whatever the result she claimed she wanted by bringing the case she ain't got it. However, if as I keep saying, she was only in it for the money against an easy high profile target - well I have proven my point.

[altus]

7 minutes ago, ECCOnoob said:

Except, only one side of the parties was the one demanding Justice, demanding the truth must come out demanding a voice must be heard.

 

I think you will find the prince maintained denial of the accusations and had no liability right from the start of all this..... and guess what, that's exactly what the outcome has been.

 

Whatever the result she claimed she wanted by bringing the case she ain't got it. However, if as I keep saying, she was only in it for the money against an easy high profile target - well I have proven my point.

The prince previously said he would never settle and wanted a jury trial so to imply she's the only one to go back on what they previously claimed is disingenuous. He is just as responsible for things not being tested in court as she is.

 

Andrew may have avoided facing the allegations in court and as such not been found liable. That doesn't mean things will go back to how they were before for him. His reputation is shredded, he's lost all his official positions and will never be a 'public' royal again.