Would you say a sign saying 'girls toys' is inappropriate?

[WiseOwl182]

1 minute ago, SnailyBoy said:

Huh, what does that mean?

Read the studies, read the actual conclusions, and then read the arguments and claims by posters on here. It will become clearer.

[SnailyBoy]

17 minutes ago, WiseOwl182 said:

Read the studies, read the actual conclusions, and then read the arguments and claims by posters on here. It will become clearer.

Can you provide examples?

[WiseOwl182]

3 hours ago, SnailyBoy said:

Can you provide examples?

Yes, they're in the thread if you could be bothered to read. Here's one example from post 161:

 

"Studies have quite clearly shown that gender marketed toys cause actual harm."

 

Actual harm. I can't remember reading that conclusion...

[SnailyBoy]

38 minutes ago, WiseOwl182 said:

Yes, they're in the thread if you could be bothered to read. Here's one example from post 161:

 

"Studies have quite clearly shown that gender marketed toys cause actual harm."

 

Actual harm. I can't remember reading that conclusion...

Well, what would 'actual harm' look like to you?

 

For example, reinforcing gender stereotypes, is that 'actual harm'?

 

Obviously you'll have to consider the poster of #161 thought to continue the debate.

 

[WiseOwl182]

1 hour ago, SnailyBoy said:

Well, what would 'actual harm' look like to you?

 

For example, reinforcing gender stereotypes, is that 'actual harm'?

 

Obviously you'll have to consider the poster of #161 thought to continue the debate.

 

Irrelevant. The studies did not conclude any harm, that's a further, subjective interpretation. Some may say conjecture.

[BrexitGuy]

2 minutes ago, WiseOwl182 said:

Irrelevant. The studies did not conclude any harm, that's a further, subjective interpretation. Some may say conjecture.

It is. Can't believe how gullable some people are. 

[SnailyBoy]

4 minutes ago, WiseOwl182 said:

Irrelevant. The studies did not conclude any harm, that's a further, subjective interpretation. Some may say conjecture.

Well it isn't irrelevant as you bought 'actual harm' into this part of the conversation.

 

Anyway, what do you think the studies concluded?

 

 

[Guest makapaka]

Just now, SnailyBoy said:

Well it isn't irrelevant as you bought 'actual harm' into this part of the conversation.

 

Anyway, what do you think the studies concluded?

 

 

No cyclone brought up actual harm.

 

why do you keep asking what the studies concluded?

 

Have you not read it? 

 

I posted it earlier but you told me I’d cherry picked it - even though I pasted it from the text you posted.

 

 

[WiseOwl182]

9 minutes ago, SnailyBoy said:

Well it isn't irrelevant as you bought 'actual harm' into this part of the conversation.

 

Anyway, what do you think the studies concluded?

 

 

I know what they didn't conclude - actual harm.

 

 

[SnailyBoy]

3 minutes ago, WiseOwl182 said:

I know what they didn't conclude - actual harm.

 

 

What do you think the studies concluded?