Jump to content

The Consequences of Brexit [Part 6] READ FIRST POST BEFORE COMMENTING


Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Lockdoctor said:

You make a valid point regarding VAT.  I believe Luxembourg has benefited from having the lowest VAT rate in the EU. (Ebay)  Regarding VAT, the collection is based a great deal on  the honesty of businesses and spot checks.  Many people this weekend will have busy been doing their self assessment returns which similar to VAT is based on honesty. There is no reason custom payments relating to goods crossing the Irish border can't be similarly based on honesty instead of border checks.  

No reason at all, no.

 

You lads have such a clean slate about import duties. Squeeky-clean, that is :thumbsup:

 

:lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, L00b said:

No reason at all, no.

 

You lads have such a clean slate about import duties. Squeeky-clean, that is :thumbsup:

 

:lol:

Businesses buy from each other using well documented methods for tax already. Imports from non EU countries are documented and tax is collected at the rate indicated by commodity code quickly and easily.

Smuggling across borders can happen. It can happen now within the EU, cigs and wine from the continent for example.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Penistone999 said:

Mays surrender deal would mean  still having the ECJ interfering in our business for a start.  That is not acceptable in any way shape of form.  

Tell that to the bloke on the news last week who although never having been convicted of anything, had a massive police file on him for no other reason than the police disliked his politics.

 

The police refused to delete this maliciously held information and EVERY UK court backed the police. It was only when he took it to the ECHR that the police were ordered to destroy the information.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Lockdoctor said:

Wetherspoons  have changed their buying policy since the democratic UK people voted to leave the EU.  I believe they have stopped selling French champagne.

Lol - the champagne producers of Reims and Epernay must be quaking in their boots at the thought of losing a fraction of  0.01% of their exports.

 

The odd time I've been in a 'spoons boozer the folk were there for cheap food and beer - precisely zero champagne drinkers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Top Cats Hat said:

 

The police refused to delete this maliciously held information and EVERY UK court backed the police. It was only when he took it to the ECHR that the police were ordered to destroy the information.

thats the echr, its the ecj which penny has a flea in his flat cap about

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Longcol said:

Lol - the champagne producers of Reims and Epernay must be quaking in their boots at the thought of losing a fraction of  0.01% of their exports.

 

The odd time I've been in a 'spoons boozer the folk were there for cheap food and beer - precisely zero champagne drinkers

Excellent.

 

If we can increase the cost of champagne massively in the UK it will hurt the affluent middle-class and the rich who consume it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Car Boot said:

If we can increase the cost of champagne massively in the UK it will hurt the affluent middle-class and the rich who consume it.

Yes, because the rich spend such a large slice of their disposable income on Champagne! 🙄

 

In your anti working class, post Brexit world, the rich, free of regulation, will be even richer and the poor will be much, much poorer working longer hours for less money with little or no protection from exploitation.

 

You represent the very worst of middle class student politics. 😡

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.