WiseOwl182 Posted March 26, 2019 Share Posted March 26, 2019 (edited) 2 hours ago, Mr Fisk said: Finally, CPS data still shows the percentage of groups committing grooming/sexual exploitation/ paedophilia activity- are white. But no one hears about their religion- one thing the media loves to point out when it comes to brown coloured culprits.. it is always Pakistani 'Muslims'- which just fuels the fire. What percentage does the CPS data show are Muslim? How does that figure compare proportionately with the proportion of the UK population as a whole that are Muslim? Genuine question, as I don't know, but saying this country's paedophiles are mainly white is to be expected in a country with around 86% white population. It's only true of they're over represented compared with proportion of population. Edited March 26, 2019 by WiseOwl182 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K1Machine Posted March 26, 2019 Share Posted March 26, 2019 2 hours ago, Mr Fisk said: ****snipped**** Finally, CPS data still shows the percentage of groups committing grooming/sexual exploitation/ paedophilia activity- are white. But no one hears about their religion- one thing the media loves to point out when it comes to brown coloured culprits.. it is always Pakistani 'Muslims'- which just fuels the fire. I agree to a point. But lets be clear, its now a well known fact that the reason these men got away with their crimes for so long was BECAUSE they were Pakistani Muslims and some people didn't want to be considered racist for pointing out there may be an issue with grooming white girls in the Pakistani community. The Police, Social services, Councillors all wanted to be seen as PC and didn't want to be called racist for pointing out religion or heritage. In my view this fuelled the fire because I don't believe they would have been labelled racist or bigoted for calling out these gangs and I believe the Pakistani community as a whole would be as outraged as the rest of us. As usual, its white middled class people getting offended on behalf of others and in turn this has given knuckle draggers the opportunity to label ALL Pakistanis or ALL Muslims as child grooming rapists. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K1Machine Posted March 26, 2019 Share Posted March 26, 2019 2 hours ago, Mr Fisk said: The same could be asked "do all catholics rape little boys" or do all football coaches groom boys" and the answer is also a NO. You also need to look at the gangs convicted so far and there seems to be some correlation- when it comes to the industry they work in. I think it is less about culture or religion than opportunity and circumstance. These small towns, Asians control the night-time economy – working in takeaways or driving minicabs. Just as church schools or football clubs provided opportunities for certain types of men to commit sexual offences. These groups form their gangs from here, working in this night time environment- they have full access to what they crave, taking full advantage. Finally, CPS data still shows the percentage of groups committing grooming/sexual exploitation/ paedophilia activity- are white. But no one hears about their religion- one thing the media loves to point out when it comes to brown coloured culprits.. it is always Pakistani 'Muslims'- which just fuels the fire. My Bold Id go along with this. The only bit I would disagree with is your use of the term Asians. Lets be accurate and say it how it is. It is mainly Pakistani males. Please lets not tarnish a whole continent for the actions of a tiny %. As for the rest of your contribution I would say its bang on the money and a damn fine post.. 4 hours ago, woodview said: I agree. I was gobsmacked that one head of a catholic boarding school was 100% aware of what was going on, and witnessed it, and chose to do nothing. Nothing was done to him, as apparently it isn't a crime, and he is still at the school. Not a crime? What kind of mentality even thinks like that? And to think these people are in a position of influence and power but when you have the head of the catholic church turning a blind eye I bet its easy for them to feel invincible and untouchable. Something needs to be done but I haven't a clue what. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 26, 2019 Share Posted March 26, 2019 42 minutes ago, WiseOwl182 said: What percentage does the CPS data show are Muslim? How does that figure compare proportionately with the proportion of the UK population as a whole that are Muslim? Genuine question, as I don't know, but saying this country's paedophiles are mainly white is to be expected in a country with around 86% white population. It's only true of they're over represented compared with proportion of population. I don't know and I doubt CPS do as groups are not categorized by faith. 12 minutes ago, K1Machine said: My Bold Id go along with this. The only bit I would disagree with is your use of the term Asians. Lets be accurate and say it how it is. It is mainly Pakistani males. Please lets not tarnish a whole continent for the actions of a tiny %. As for the rest of your contribution I would say its bang on the money and a damn fine post.. Not a crime? What kind of mentality even thinks like that? And to think these people are in a position of influence and power but when you have the head of the catholic church turning a blind eye I bet its easy for them to feel invincible and untouchable. Something needs to be done but I haven't a clue what. Ok. A lot of these men are Pakistani or from similar backgrounds- but if we don't want to tarnish Asians then the same applies to the usage of Muslim. Lets call them Pakistani because by adding 'Muslims' it groups a world wide religion- many who abide by laws and are sickened by the acts of these vile men. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K1Machine Posted March 26, 2019 Share Posted March 26, 2019 (edited) 5 minutes ago, Mr Fisk said: Ok. A lot of these men are Pakistani or from similar backgrounds- but if we don't want to tarnish Asians then the same applies to the usage of Muslim. Lets call them Pakistani because by adding 'Muslims' it groups a world wide religion- many who abide by laws and are sickened by the acts of these vile men. That seems fair. Edited March 26, 2019 by K1Machine Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scrapper Posted March 27, 2019 Share Posted March 27, 2019 theres a book out about those scum /amanda spencer and the whiteley brothers/ its called pimped. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K1Machine Posted March 27, 2019 Share Posted March 27, 2019 Filthy gets should have got life. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyclone Posted April 1, 2019 Share Posted April 1, 2019 On 26/03/2019 at 22:27, K1Machine said: That seems fair. It's seems fair to not use Muslim, because that is an overly broad generalisation, but an entire nationality, you don't see a problem with that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K1Machine Posted April 1, 2019 Share Posted April 1, 2019 3 hours ago, Cyclone said: It's seems fair to not use Muslim, because that is an overly broad generalisation, but an entire nationality, you don't see a problem with that? Who said it was an entire nationality? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyclone Posted April 1, 2019 Share Posted April 1, 2019 What do you think Pakistani is if not a nationality? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now