Consequences of Brexit [part 7] Read first post before posting

[melthebell]

56 minutes ago, Car Boot said:

In the next referendum, and the EU and the establishment elite will make absolutely certain there is another, the Leave campaign will be strengthened by the public awareness that they didn't allow us to Leave the first time. 

 

Our EU membership has torn apart society and finally revealed that it is the corporates that have all the power, not the people.

Hogwash, the media, Cameron, the Tories, labour and brexit have divided the nation

[surveyour]

13 hours ago, REUBEN 123 said:

They can,t agree on anything because they are all feathering their own nests. 

I just can’t see them making a success out of leaving, they are constantly back biting, back stabbing each other!!! 

[ANGELFIRE1]

On 29/03/2019 at 12:14, bendix said:

The director of audiences for BBC Question Time is a lady called Alison Fuller Pedley.  She is employed by Menton Media, the company that has made BBCQT for the last 20 years or so.  She isn't a BBC employee.

 

It's her job to select the audience and she alone chooses who gets to speak.   The is the reason so many 'members of the public' who have appeared 3-4 times each asking questions at different locations around the country have been revealed to be UKIP candidates.

 

Fuller Pedley herself is a Britain First sympathiser, regularly sharing BF posts on her FB page.  Indeed, it got so bad that she was officially warned by the BBC for being seen to be biased.

 

You UKIPers really ought to do some research before making such claims.  Otherwise you look silly.

Non of that explains why the Audience was obviously pro remain does it.

 

Angel1. 

[surveyour]

If an MP is affiliated with a party, and felt they had the conviction to leave the party, as they no longer beleaved in the position of the party Interms of Brexit.... would it not be equally right to apply those same convictions to the public who voted for them to peruse a Brexit in their name, if they no longer where in the opinion that Brexit was in the best interest of the country.... then they should resign from there position as an MP... and let the public vote on possibly electing an MP  whom is able to deliver on there wishes.

 

 

[Guest]

I wonder if those who want to remain in the EU and also those who want to leave but support Therea May's deal actually know what the deal says.
There are 585 pages which are a minefield of legal Jargon but when examined, show some horrifying facts that most of the population are unaware of and the politicians have been keeping this very quiet.
If you think the backstop is the only problem then think again.

 

Other Major Failings of May’s deal

 ‘LEVEL PLAYING FIELD’ ALIGNMENT:
The Agreement puts rules into place which mean the UK is required to keep in regulatory alignment with the EU on
matters such as agriculture subsidies and tax policy. This would effectively give the EU control over the UK’s economic
policy. The UK would not be able to lower taxes and increase subsidies where necessary to vital parts of our economy,
or be free to compete on the global stage to our best advantage, being tied to EU regulations.

 

 UK TO POTENTIALLY HAVE TO FUND A EUROZONE BAILOUT:
The UK would be listed as a ‘participating state’ within the EU’s Civil Protection Mechanism, paving the way for the
UK to once again have to contribute money to any Eurozone bailout. (The EU Civil Protection Mechanism was how
we were forced into giving the Eurozone money in the aftermath of the 2008 economic crash) How can we leave the
EU if, after Brexit, we are forced into a position where we may have to bail out the EU from their own economic messes
in the future?

 

 EU CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL CONTRIBUTIONS:
The Withdrawal Agreement stipulates the ECJ and the European Commission would be able to set the legal levels of
the UK’s financial contributions to fund European bodies which the Agreement commits the UK to be part of - whether
these are military, economic or humanitarian. In effect we would be handing the EU a blank cheque for any of their
future vanity projects, whether we wish to be part of them – or not.

 

 EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE:
For the duration of the transition period and any continuation of it - whether in the Irish Backstop or other
arrangements - the UK is bound by decisions of the European Court and would be legally obligated to put
into place the precedent set by any European judge for a minimum of 5 years.
So, without any influence over the European Court, this country would, in effect, be a ‘vassal’ to the ECJ and
would be forced to accept the rulings of a foreign power after Brexit.

 SECURITY ISSUES:
The Withdrawal Agreement commits the UK to sharing sensitive intelligence data with the EU after Brexit, regardless
of our desire or the advisability of doing so. This would include information we have obtained while collaborating with
non-EU Member States and would endanger our position within the 5 EYES intelligence sharing community of
America, Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the United Kingdom. We have far superior links with these countries
than we have with the EU. We cannot compromise our ongoing trusted arrangements with our most important allies.
Beyond this, the Withdrawal Agreement also commits the UK TO CONTRIBUTE TOWARDS FUNDING AND SUPPLYING OUR TROOPS
FOR ANY EUROPEAN UNION MILITARY OPERATIONS WHICH OCCUR IN THE COMING YEARS. I.E. we would be committing British
Troops to potentially fight in combat in which the UK has no desire to become involved in – and this would potentially
lead to them fighting against our own people!

 SHARING OF UK CITIZENS PERSONAL DATA:
The UK commits to sharing the sensitive data of UK citizens with European databases in order to increase cooperation
on a range of issues, including security and policing. However, the statements within the Withdrawal Agreement are
vague, opening up a wide range of private data, such as bank details and more, being shared. Such a policy would also
create a goldmine for potential hackers. How can British citizens trust a foreign power to look after their data after
Brexit?

[melthebell]

Project fear 😱

 

😂

[Guest]

Certainly plenty to fear there.

[Penistone999]

4 hours ago, hauxwell said:

I wonder what the world thinks of our politicians?  

 

They probably think they are a bunch of muppets , and rightly so .

[Penistone999]

Was listening to the radio this morning, and they were talking to a former Labour adviser ,and they said that there is concern among the Labour leadership that UKIP will pick up a lot of the Leave voters at the next General Election because they feel the present politicians are trying to stop Brexit. Im assuming this concern is also present in the Tory party.  I do think all this is playing into UKIP`s hands . 17.4m very angry  voters can do a lot of damage to the Tories AND Labour. 

 

 

[Guest]

EU EXIT app is rubbish. 2 newer phones, wont scan passport properly,  getting settled status by pigeon post will be faster