Top Cats Hat Posted March 29, 2019 Share Posted March 29, 2019 19 minutes ago, Ridgewalk said: Surprised this is only just coming into the public domaine. There were other arrests in similar circumstances at the same time, people given a midnight visit and confined to barracks or locked up for the day of the wedding. Actually this has been around for at least a decade. I seem to remember some members of Movement Against the Monarchy being pre-emptively arrested and detained before some royal event in the early 2000s. While we are bashing our politicians for acting against our interests maybe someone needs to ask the police why they think it is acceptable to use our money and to abuse our human rights in order to prevent upsetting the royal family. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I1L2T3 Posted March 29, 2019 Share Posted March 29, 2019 Did dispersal orders exist at that point. Might have been more sensible if they did Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Top Cats Hat Posted March 29, 2019 Share Posted March 29, 2019 3 minutes ago, I1L2T3 said: Did dispersal orders exist at that point. Might have been more sensible if they did Dispersal Orders wouldn't have been appropriate as they were nowhere near the area when they were detained. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Cid Posted March 29, 2019 Share Posted March 29, 2019 Its a slippery slope, I think that even people that plan an illegal act, may not follow it through. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Top Cats Hat Posted March 29, 2019 Share Posted March 29, 2019 6 minutes ago, El Cid said: Its a slippery slope, I think that even people that plan an illegal act, may not follow it through. Planning an illegal act is an illegal act in itself whether it is carried out or not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I1L2T3 Posted March 29, 2019 Share Posted March 29, 2019 1 hour ago, Top Cats Hat said: Dispersal Orders wouldn't have been appropriate as they were nowhere near the area when they were detained. I didn’t think they had to me. I know people who got dispersal orders a mile from a football ground Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Top Cats Hat Posted March 29, 2019 Share Posted March 29, 2019 1 minute ago, I1L2T3 said: I didn’t think they had to me. I know people who got dispersal orders a mile from a football ground These people were arrested at their homes and detained the day before the event on the other side of London Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nikki-red Posted March 29, 2019 Share Posted March 29, 2019 (edited) Posts have been removed. Discuss the topic not each other please. Edited March 29, 2019 by nikki-red Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ANGELFIRE1 Posted March 30, 2019 Share Posted March 30, 2019 I agree with the majority, a slippery slope. On the other hand, if "Royalty" is involved, common sense goes straight out of the window and all bets are off. The delicate "Royal" ears will never hear or their eyes never see any dissent if it is possible to avoid it. Angel1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lex Luthor Posted March 31, 2019 Share Posted March 31, 2019 Slippery slope. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now