Jump to content

Who next - new President of the European Commission?


Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, Voice of reason said:

I mean in general, not just British.

Macron (who is on 30% approval rating in his own country) is proposing Merkel. A more indirect democratic link is hard to imagine.

So the French proposal is Angela, instead of a French politicien?

 

Fancy Macron pushing a candidate with genuine capabilities, rather than a cronyist/nationalistic selection of a meriting high level civil servant. I bet the énarques and polytechniciens (French equivalent to your OxBridge mandarin types) are seething with incandescent rage...a good thing :D

 

Germany's actual proposal is Schauble IIRC?

 

Who is the UK's?

 

Angela would still need electing with a majority of the 761MEPs all the same. A tall order, actually. There's no love lost for Ze Germans in most of the Club Meds and Eastern european + balkanic countries.

Edited by L00b
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, L00b said:

So the French proposal is Angela, instead of a French politician. Fancy Macron pushing a candidate with genuine capabilities, rather than a cronyist/nationalistic selection of a meriting high level civil servant. I bet the énarques and polytechniciens (French equivalent to your OxBridge mandarin types) are seething with incandescent rage :D

 

Germany's actual proposal is Schauble IIRC?

 

Who is the UK's?

Germany's proposal is manfred weber. I don't know who our proposed, or supported candidate is. As I said, it is so far removed from our control, it is barely worth following, beyond knowing the huge impact that person will have on EU life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Voice of reason said:

Germany's proposal is manfred weber. I don't know who our proposed, or supported candidate is. As I said, it is so far removed from our control, it is barely worth following, beyond knowing the huge impact that person will have on EU life.

The EU Commission President, in and of him/herself, does not have that big an impact at all: the Council and the Parliament have a much bigger impact.

 

Sure, it's not a honorific title (like e.g. Ireland's President), but it's less executive in nature than you seem to believe: most of the 'power' associated with the role is PR (figurehead role, particularly relevant for diplomatic (outra-EU) purposes) and soft (selection of Commissioners). The President doesn't propose EU law, for starters: Commissioners do (and he/she must give 1 Commissioner post to each member state).

 

The job is *all* about consensus politics, something which British politicians are sorely lacking experience in. I'm not surprised Juncker did well in his tenure: Luxembourgish politics have been *all* about consensus politics for decades, both domestically and internationally.

Edited by L00b
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, L00b said:

The EU Commission President, in and of him/herself, does not have that big an impact at all: the Council and the Parliament have a much bigger impact.

 

Sure, it's not a honorific title (like e.g. Ireland's President), but it's less executive in nature than you seem to believe: most of the 'power' associated with the role is PR (figurehead role, particularly relevant for diplomatic (outra-EU) purposes) and soft (selection of Commissioners). The President doesn't propose EU law, for starters: Commissioners do (and he/she must give 1 Commissioner post to each member state).

 

The job is *all* about consensus politics, something which British politicians are sorely lacking experience in. I'm not surprised Juncker did well in his tenure: Luxembourgish politics have been *all* about consensus politics for decades, both domestically and internationally.

Yeah, he or she justs selects the comissioners who propose all eu legislation, covering 500 million people.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Voice of reason said:

Yeah, he or she justs selects the comissioners who propose all eu legislation, covering 500 million people.

EU legislation within specific areas of consensually-pooled sovereignty, is the bit you're missing, and wherein such areas exclude taxation, non-EU immigration, defense, etc. (quite a lot, actually).

 

The UK signed on that particular dot way-back-when in full knowledge of the fact, and has also managed to nab itself the longest list of exceptions to the principle of any member state old and newer, to the extent of enjoying the sweetest EU membership deal by a country mile.

 

But manifestly, these days it's not good enough for very many Brits anymore, so well...good luck to them, they can discover and enjoy life without the perks, with luck they might find it formative :)

Edited by L00b
Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, L00b said:

But manifestly, these days it's not good enough for very many Brits anymore, so well...good luck to them, they can discover and enjoy life without the perks, with luck they might find it formative :)

Very many Brits never enjoyed the so-called 'perks' of EU membership despite living under its rule for the last 46 years.

 

I guess they won't miss something they never had.

Edited by Car Boot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.