Jump to content

Boris Johnson Wants An Amnesty For Illegal Immigrants, Do You?


Recommended Posts

55 minutes ago, CaptainSwing said:

Imagine the furore if it had been Mr Corbyn proposing an amnesty for illegal immigrants.  Or, indeed, the massive debt-fuelled public spending binge that Mr Johnson has also promised.

Yes, Corbyn’s spending proposals are seen as dangerous and uncosted, whereas Johnson’s are simply him carrying out what he promised Conservative members in the leadership election.

 

If he is serious about a no deal Brexit, it is going to cost the nation £billions in preparations never mind the £billions the no deal exit would cost when it happens.

 

He just doesn’t have the money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Top Cats Hat said:

Yes, Corbyn’s spending proposals are seen as dangerous and uncosted, whereas Johnson’s are simply him carrying out what he promised Conservative members in the leadership election.

 

If he is serious about a no deal Brexit, it is going to cost the nation £billions in preparations never mind the £billions the no deal exit would cost when it happens.

 

He just doesn’t have the money.

What is the difference, in terms of how much the proposals would cost, between what Boris and Corbyn have promised? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Top Cats Hat said:

Yes, Corbyn’s spending proposals are seen as dangerous and uncosted, whereas Johnson’s are simply him carrying out what he promised Conservative members in the leadership election.

 

If he is serious about a no deal Brexit, it is going to cost the nation £billions in preparations never mind the £billions the no deal exit would cost when it happens.

 

He just doesn’t have the money.

What preparations? We haven’t done anything!

 

The french have built lorry parks, got the number plate recognition thing sorted, staff trained. We’ve done nowt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Robin-H said:

What is the difference, in terms of how much the proposals would cost, between what Boris and Corbyn have promised? 

Apples and pears. They are both proposing different things costing different amounts.

 

Corbyn’s proposals would probably cost more, but then the nation would have hugely valuable assets like its own rail companies, whereas Johnson’s 20,000 extra bobbies on the beat may cost less but will only restore police numbers to pro-austerity levels.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Top Cats Hat said:

Apples and pears. They are both proposing different things costing different amounts.

 

Corbyn’s proposals would probably cost more, but then the nation would have hugely valuable assets like its own rail companies, whereas Johnson’s 20,000 extra bobbies on the beat may cost less but will only restore police numbers to pro-austerity levels.

The total cost clearly matters as to whether it is seen as economically dangerous or not. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BoJo wants unicorns and fairy dust because that's what he will need to pay for all his promises...

 

When it doesn't appear it will all be the EU's fault.

 

He is a lying misogynistic sexist cheating backstabbing w**ker - just for for the current government.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Robin-H said:

The total cost clearly matters as to whether it is seen as economically dangerous or not. 

Not necessarily. 

 

Spending £billions on something like Brexit preparations that you wont get back in advance of something totally avoidable is economically dangerous at the best of times, never mind at a time when we are already in economic difficulties and the pound is heading for record lows.

 

You don’t need to know the exact figures to know that this is not good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Robin-H said:

The total cost clearly matters as to whether it is seen as economically dangerous or not. 

Pledging many tens of billions of pounds without credible sources of that extra funding surely brings significant potential risks?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mister Gee said:

Pledging many tens of billions of pounds without credible sources of that extra funding surely brings significant potential risks?

Yes it does, and pledging a higher figure therefore comes with higher risk. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.