Consequences Of Brexit [Part 8] Read First Post Before Posting

[Robin-H]

25 minutes ago, Lockdoctor said:

Because they wrongly assumed parliament was going to to be prorogued until 1st November.  The new session of Parliament will start in October before our country leaves the EU.  

 

Not at all embarrassing.  Boris is eager to get on implementing the 2016 democratic EU referendum result and to give other important issues the attention they deserve in the new session of Parliament. I am looking forward to the Queen's speech to hear what Boris is planning to do in the next year after our country has left the EU.  Boris has the makings to be one of our country's best Prime Ministers in recent times. 

I think that's an important point.

 

Boris is still leaving an avenue open for the ratification of a withdrawal agreement. If he was set on a no deal, he could have prorogued parliament until after the 31st, which would have prevented any sort of deal. It also means that there will be time, both before and after the prorogation, for the remain factions in parliament to get their act together, use a  Standing Order 24 to get an emergency debate on forcing government to ask for an Article 50 extension. Although against precedent, Bercow will undoubtedly allow it. 

[Top Cats Hat]

12 minutes ago, hobinfoot said:

I’ve said many times if you didn’t have a good reason not to vote I’ve no sympathy. So if you’re claim about 60-70% is right it makes no difference they had a choice.

This is nothing to do with who voted and who didn’t vote. 

 

I am simply saying that as an indication of popular feeling on EU membership, the 2016 referendum is pretty meaningless and is certainly not a democratic mandate for anything.

[RJRB]

If anyone  ever doubted the ability of politicians to lie through their teeth for their own self interest then watch Johnson,Gove ,Rees Mogg and any number of others that are wheeled out to insist that the latest shenanigans are not Brexit related.

We are just treated with contempt.

[Lockdoctor]

10 minutes ago, RJRB said:

If anyone  ever doubted the ability of politicians to lie through their teeth for their own self interest then watch Johnson,Gove ,Rees Mogg and any number of others that are wheeled out to insist that the latest shenanigans are not Brexit related.

We are just treated with contempt.

That is hilarious given the circumstances when we have MPs wishing to pass a law saying our country can't leave the EU without a deal.  The truth is  to rule out  a no-deal is the same as our country remaining in the EU.  If you believe Johnson, Gove  and Rees -Mogg  are involved in shenanigans then be honest enough to acknowledge those wishing to take no-deal of the table are also involved in shenanigans.

Edited August 29, 2019 by Lockdoctor

[I1L2T3]

36 minutes ago, hauxwell said:

Huge Grant the actor who use to pick up prostitutes has the nerve to call Johnson, 

an over promoted rubber bath toy, for messing with his children’s future.  

What a fine specimen Grant is to his daughter, the man who was prosecuted for picking up prostitutes. 

 

If Grant had to pick up sex workers when he was in a relationship with a good looking woman like Elizabeth Hurley, he will still be at it today, looking for rubber sex toys to have fun with.

 

Twisted childlike logic there. Whatever his past it doesn’t mean he doesn’t care about his kids. In fact his mistakes might make him care more for all you know.

 

 

[Top Cats Hat]

11 minutes ago, RJRB said:

If anyone  ever doubted the ability of politicians to lie through their teeth for their own self interest then watch Johnson,Gove ,Rees Mogg and any number of others that are wheeled out to insist that the latest shenanigans are not Brexit related.

We are just treated with contempt.

Last night Channel Four News played interviews with Gove, Javid, Raab, Rudd and other cabinet ministers saying that proroguing Parliament was out of order and something that they would never support.

[hobinfoot]

21 minutes ago, Top Cats Hat said:

This is nothing to do with who voted and who didn’t vote. 

 

I am simply saying that as an indication of popular feeling on EU membership, the 2016 referendum is pretty meaningless and is certainly not a democratic mandate for anything.

Leave won it’s simple if remain had won that would have been just has simple.

[Lockdoctor]

1 minute ago, Top Cats Hat said:

Last night Channel Four News played interviews with Gove, Javid, Raab, Rudd and other cabinet ministers saying that proroguing Parliament was out of order and something that they would never support.

Did you not see Newsnight lat night when Peter Bone stated he wouldn't have supported proroguing Parliament until 1st November which hasn't happened?  The new session of Parliament will start several weeks before our country to leaves the EU that is why the MPs you have named will not see what has happened as being out of order.

[Top Cats Hat]

2 hours ago, Dromedary said:

Very highly unlikely especially as there is not a majority of support even for independence. At the last Scottish Independence referendum in 2014 the voter margin was 10.6% in favour of no.

So you evidence that there is not a majority for Scottish independence by quoting a five year old referendum?

 

Surely what is much more relevant is that in August 2019, independence for Scotland has a 3% (and growing) lead in the poll.

[Robin-H]

3 minutes ago, Top Cats Hat said:

So you evidence that there is not a majority for Scottish independence by quoting a five year old referendum?

 

Surely what is much more relevant is that in August 2019, independence for Scotland has a 3% (and growing) lead in the poll.

3%. Pah - that wouldn't give anyone a democratic mandate for anything!