Consequences Of Brexit [Part 8] Read First Post Before Posting

[Obelix]

I just demonstrated that your assertion anoyne over 18 can stand to be utterly baseless Drome.

That is sufficient.

[Dromedary]

5 minutes ago, Longcol said:

So explain - a government with a small majority passes a statute to abolish opposition parties, packs out the Lords to make sure it gets onto the statute books - then what?

I refer the gentleman to post #362!

5 minutes ago, Obelix said:

I just demonstrated that your assertion anoyne over 18 can stand to be utterly baseless Drome.

That is sufficient.

No, you are just being pedantic for the sake of it as always and dont like being corrected.

 

The only bit you were correct about was this "Crucially idiots and lunatics - both terms with specific if outdated legal meanings are unable to stand too..."

 

Which is basically pretty obvious as I doubt they would be capable of filling in the forms or getting the deposit.

Edited September 1, 2019 by Dromedary

[Longcol]

4 minutes ago, Dromedary said:

I refer the gentleman to post #362!

 

I don't think SF mods consider they are the arbiters of the British Constitution.

 

Now would you care to answer my question.

[Obelix]

6 minutes ago, Dromedary said:

I refer the gentleman to post #362!

No, you are just being pedantic for the sake of it as always and dont like being corrected.

 

The only bit you were correct about was this "Crucially idiots and lunatics - both terms with specific if outdated legal meanings are unable to stand too..."

 

Which is basically pretty obvious as I doubt they would be capable of filling in the forms or getting the deposit.

I'm sorry. You said that anyone could enter with the clear intention to show that stupid people can enter Parliament.

I demonstrated that you are both wrong, and there are safeguards against this.

 

Would you like to quit whilst you are behind or do you need your nose rubbing in it further?

Edited September 1, 2019 by Obelix

[Dromedary]

7 minutes ago, Longcol said:

I don't think SF mods consider they are the arbiters of the British Constitution.

 

Now would you care to answer my question.

Sorry my mistake, maybe.. But I refer you to #368 instead!

5 minutes ago, Obelix said:

I'm sorry. You said that anyone could enter with the clear intention to show that stupid people can enter Parliament.

No I did not. I said:

"No it does not as anyone over 18 regardless of education or qualifications can enter parliament as an MP, providing they are elected according to the rules. "

 

Those same rules would also rule out what you call..

 

"Crucially idiots and lunatics - ..."

Edited September 1, 2019 by Dromedary

[Longcol]

5 minutes ago, Dromedary said:

Sorry my mistake, maybe.. But I refer you to #368 instead!

 

You mean you're unable to answer the question  "What is to stop Parliament changing the rules to abolish all opposition parties?" 

 

eg. passing a statute

Edited September 1, 2019 by Longcol

[Obelix]

19 minutes ago, Dromedary said:

Sorry my mistake, maybe.. But I refer you to #368 instead!

No I did not. I said:

"No it does not as anyone over 18 regardless of education or qualifications can enter parliament as an MP, providing they are elected according to the rules. "

 

Those same rules would also rule out what you call..

 

"Crucially idiots and lunatics - ..."

Regardless of qualifications?

 

People qualified as idiots and lunatics are not allowed.

 

It's unclear if camels are allowed but I suspect not.

[Longcol]

3 minutes ago, Obelix said:

It's unclear if camels are allowed but I suspect not.

I think they're further down the food chain than Monk Bretton Civil Servants for Marxist / Faragist / Moggism.

[Obelix]

1 minute ago, Longcol said:

I think they're further down the food chain than Monk Bretton Civil Servants for Marxist / Faragist / Moggism.

Thats impressive... I thought they were the archetypical bottom feeders...

[Robin-H]

22 minutes ago, Longcol said:

You mean you're unable to answer the question  "What is to stop Parliament changing the rules to abolish all opposition parties?" 

 

eg. passing a statute

The courts. They would stop it.