Jump to content

Consequences Of Brexit [Part 8] Read First Post Before Posting


Message added by Vaati

Mod Note: As we are getting rather tired of seeing reports about this. The use of the word Remoaners  is to cease. Either posts like adults, or don't post at all. The mod warnings have been clear.

Message added by mort

In addition to remoaner we are also not going to allow the use of libdums or liebore - if you cannot behave like adults and post without recourse to these childish insults then please refrain from posting. If you have a problem with this then you all know where the helpdesk is. 

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, apelike said:

So basically it is just hearsay with nothing to back it up and nothing more! We seem to be getting quite a lot of that on here lately.

Well tell you what, if Her Majesty was concerned about the state of British politics in 2016, what has happened since them to reassure her that everything is OK?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Top Cats Hat said:

Well tell you what, if Her Majesty was concerned about the state of British politics in 2016, what has happened since them to reassure her that everything is OK?

I dont know and neither do you, and that is the problem. She was alleged to say that she had privately expressed disappointment in the current political class and its "inability to govern", a report has claimed, and that was in 2016.

 

According to the Sunday Times:

 

The newspaper quoted a royal source who claimed the 93-year-old monarch's frustrations have grown since then.

"I think she's really dismayed," the source said.

"I've heard her talking about her disappointment in the current political class and its inability to govern correctly."

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Amber Rudd quits cabinet and Conservative party"

 

Great to see true supporters of the UK standing up for what they believe in.

 

Not the hollow rhetoric of the economy trashing brexiteers who follow Boris (the lying cheating racist PM) like sheep.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, apelike said:

"I've heard her talking about her disappointment in the current political class and its inability to govern correctly."

So in the week when the government has gone from a majority of +1 to a minority of -41, Parliament has cut the legs from under the cabinet and its policy to leave the EU with or without a deal, the Prime Minister could face jail for breaking the law by refusing to abide by an Act of Parliament, lifelong respected Conservative Party members including Churchill’s grandson have effectively been thrown out of the party and senior European Union figures have openly accused the government of lying about progress in talks about leaving, is this governing more or less correctly than in 2016 when Cameron was in charge?

 

Remember, all this happened in four days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, catmiss said:

There’s a lot of knowledgeable people on here so can you tell me why Cameron instigated the referendum in the first place? What was his motive?  

After UKIP did well in the 2014 €uro elections he was worried that they would take a big pile of votes from the Tories in the 2015 election so he promised a referendum on Europe if he won the that election.

 

He won that election and the rest is history. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Top Cats Hat said:

After UKIP did well in the 2014 €uro elections he was worried that they would take a big pile of votes from the Tories in the 2015 election so he promised a referendum on Europe if he won the that election.

 

He won that election and the rest is history. 

Sorry if I’m being dense but in the British election where would the UKIP, if I remember rightly deemed ‘a racist party’ votes have ended up? Would it have been enough to damage Cameron? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, catmiss said:

Sorry if I’m being dense but in the British election where would the UKIP, if I remember rightly deemed ‘a racist party’ votes have ended up? Would it have been enough to damage Cameron? 

I don’t think that it would have.

 

UKIP still don’t have any elected MPs. If Cameron had told UKIP to shove it, they would have lost votes to UKIP but probably not any seats in Parliament.

 

Political cowardice at the highest level.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.