Top Cats Hat Posted September 19, 2019 Share Posted September 19, 2019 Just now, staninoodle said: The account in the mail casts many doubts The Mail and the Telegraph! 😂🤣😂 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Longcol Posted September 19, 2019 Share Posted September 19, 2019 (edited) 12 minutes ago, staninoodle said: The account in the mail casts many doubts https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7449719/What-truth-Geoffrey-Boycott-lover-black-eyes.html/ https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/09/18/new-evidence-casts-doubt-sir-geoffrey-boycotts-assault-case/ https://heraldpublicist.com/new-evidence-casts-doubt-on-sir-geoffrey-boycotts-assault-case-friends-claim/ Casts plenty of doubt go and gorge boys 😊 Strange that Boycott wasn't denying she had bruising to her face and said that it was the result of a fall. Edited September 19, 2019 by Longcol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
staninoodle Posted September 19, 2019 Share Posted September 19, 2019 6 minutes ago, Top Cats Hat said: The Mail and the Telegraph! 😂🤣😂 Awww dont tell me....theyve be found guilty of violent conduct too,in a french court by any chance? So there opinions dont count 🙄 1 minute ago, Longcol said: Strange that Boycott wasn't denying she had bruising to her face and that it was the result of a fall. Your fixated,look at the bigger picture,drink it in,and digest for a while Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Longcol Posted September 19, 2019 Share Posted September 19, 2019 4 minutes ago, staninoodle said: Your fixated,look at the bigger picture,drink it in,and digest for a while Look at the pictures of her bruising (which Boycott has never denied as far as I'm aware) and tell me how you get them as the result of a fall. And her supposedly reporting to an unnamed friend in an unattributable quote that the injuries were due to a fall - one of journalisms oldest tricks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Halibut Posted September 19, 2019 Share Posted September 19, 2019 Wow. All these apologists for a woman beater. Extraordinary - and here's me thinking it was 2019, and that not all men were knobheads. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
staninoodle Posted September 20, 2019 Share Posted September 20, 2019 (edited) 1 hour ago, Halibut said: Wow. All these apologists for a woman beater. Extraordinary - and here's me thinking it was 2019, and that not all men were knobheads. Wow I thought wed stopped burning witches wayback in 1682,but in 2019 the knobheads are still here,still burning,well four of em,you never dissapoint god bless sheff forum and the 4 amigos.........enjoy your anger fellas never let it go 😂 Edited September 20, 2019 by staninoodle Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mancmart Posted September 20, 2019 Share Posted September 20, 2019 He appealed his conviction. The decision was upheld. She said it wasn't the first time. Why would she lie? He beats women, gets convicted. Why does it matter what country it was in, or what language they speak, he beats women? What is a knight of the 'realm' Honours bestowed by useless politicians. He ain't 'sir' to me. Just a sad, violent bully who hits women and gets found guilty. Make that five amigos! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Top Cats Hat Posted September 20, 2019 Share Posted September 20, 2019 10 hours ago, staninoodle said: So there opinions dont count 🙄 You said it. Opinions! Both the Mail and the Telegraph are both right-wing newspapers with a long history of racism, xenophobia and misogyny. The fact that they champion a racist and misogynist convicted in a ‘foreign’ court like Boycott, says much more about the political position of those papers than his guilt or innocence. As you said, simply opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hadron Posted September 25, 2019 Share Posted September 25, 2019 Congratulations to Sir Geoffrey Boycott for being Knighted for his services to cricket. It's great when you can be so polarised into what is black and white and be blind to the colours in between. It is never that straight forward and I can see a man that has done his best despite what some people think. Elvis Presley wrote in the back of his bible “To judge a man by his weakest link or deed is like judging the power of the ocean by one wave.” I have to feel sorry for some of the posters as to their lack of life experience and tolerance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Top Cats Hat Posted September 25, 2019 Share Posted September 25, 2019 12 minutes ago, Hadron said: Elvis Presley wrote in the back of his bible “To judge a man by his weakest link or deed is like judging the power of the ocean by one wave.” Most people on here aren’t judging him they are questioning what kind of message is given by the awarding of an honour to a very public misogynist and racist with a conviction for violence against women. He has already been judged by the courts. People are quite rightly questioning the appropriateness of the honour, not helped by it being given by a disgraced former Prime Minister. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now