jaffa1 Posted November 22, 2019 Share Posted November 22, 2019 On 21/11/2019 at 10:33, nightrider said: Some people on twitter have noted some interesting features in the famous photo of Andrew. Such as shadows being cast by some objects and not others. She seems to look happy to be there in the photograph. She looks quiet flattered. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
banjodeano Posted November 22, 2019 Share Posted November 22, 2019 1 hour ago, jaffa1 said: She seems to look happy to be there in the photograph. She looks quiet flattered. thats child grooming for you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Longcol Posted November 22, 2019 Share Posted November 22, 2019 (edited) 14 minutes ago, banjodeano said: thats child grooming for you A photo of people with arms around each others waists hardly qualifies as "child grooming" - and Guiffre hardly qualifies as a "child" in that picture - could be anything fron late teens to nigh on 30 in that photo. What's wrong with describing him as an alleged sexual predator or even rapist? "Pedo" usually belongs on stupid conspiracy theory forums like David Icke - let's not lower SF to that level. Edited November 22, 2019 by Longcol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ontarian1981 Posted November 23, 2019 Share Posted November 23, 2019 14 hours ago, PRESLEY said: To be fair I think after the Queen passes away the remaining royals should be disolved and pensioned off. Im not a royalist but I think the Queen is the best of a bad bunch. She still has the old school morales and still follows royal protocol too a T. Just look back over the past not so many years, they have all been involved in embarrasing the institution and the country with some very bad behaviour From Phillips dodgy dealings with a car crash, Charles with his triangled love affair, Harry's drug abuse in night clubs and dressing as a Natzi and much more Skulldugery from the rest of the clique over the years. If you look back it will show none of them are fit to take over from the Queen. Just imagine had Margaret been the older sister,Lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Longcol Posted November 23, 2019 Share Posted November 23, 2019 9 minutes ago, Ontarian1981 said: Just imagine had Margaret been the older sister,Lol. You win the Interwebs this week! And as a bonus big ears wouldn't be next in line. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ridgewalk Posted November 23, 2019 Share Posted November 23, 2019 12 hours ago, Longcol said: So it is alleged sexual assualt, maybe even rape. Not paedophilia (pedophilia in the USA). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedophilia "Pedophilia (alternatively spelt paedophilia) is a psychiatric disorder in which an adult or older adolescent experiences a primary or exclusive sexual attraction to prepubescent children.[1][2] Although girls typically begin the process of puberty at age 10 or 11, and boys at age 11 or 12,[3] criteria for pedophilia extend the cut-off point for prepubescence to age 13.[4] " That was the working definition of paedophilia in my professional life, since then however the definition seems to have broadened. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PRESLEY Posted November 23, 2019 Share Posted November 23, 2019 8 hours ago, Longcol said: You win the Interwebs this week! And as a bonus big ears wouldn't be next in line. Just shows how this lot are always shiftin the goal post. Edward had to abdicate over divorcee Mrs Simpson but big ears is next in line after marrying Camilla a divorcee. Just think if Mrs Simpson had been Queen, Bart would have been next in line. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ontarian1981 Posted November 23, 2019 Share Posted November 23, 2019 11 hours ago, PRESLEY said: Just shows how this lot are always shiftin the goal post. Edward had to abdicate over divorcee Mrs Simpson but big ears is next in line after marrying Camilla a divorcee. Just think if Mrs Simpson had been Queen, Bart would have been next in line. This all of a sudden popular again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
St Petre Posted November 23, 2019 Share Posted November 23, 2019 11 hours ago, PRESLEY said: Just shows how this lot are always shiftin the goal post. Edward had to abdicate over divorcee Mrs Simpson but big ears is next in line after marrying Camilla a divorcee. Just think if Mrs Simpson had been Queen, Bart would have been next in line. Just for the record; Wallis Simpson was TWICE divorced before she married Edward. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweetcheeks Posted November 23, 2019 Share Posted November 23, 2019 I believe the divorcee issue was used as a smokescreen for the fact that Edward was a nazi sympathiser and was seen as danger to the country in a time of tension between Germany and Britain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now