What If A Member Of Royal Family Was A Pedo?

[Janus]

Are we referring to the same bloke 

 

 

“Prince Andrew, airborne at the time of the attack, watched in horror as a thick black pall of smoke slowly rose from the burning Sheffield.”  🖒

Edited November 16, 2019 by Janus

[PRESLEY]

16 minutes ago, Janus said:

Are we referring to the same bloke 

 

 

“Prince Andrew, airborne at the time of the attack, watched in horror as a thick black pall of smoke slowly rose from the burning Sheffield.”  🖒

The Pilot Im on about was hovering above the Sir Gallahad where on on board was the Welsh Guards with the very badly burnt Simon Weston.

[Waldo]

1 hour ago, Janus said:

Mr Fisk-I don`t know much  about Andrew, but I do recall he risked his life saving others while hovering his helicopter over a burning ship during the Falklands conflict.

Can you explain how that has any relevance? Unless you're suggesting that the law should be more leniently applied to someone with a service history? Is that what you're suggesting?

[Ontarian1981]

2 hours ago, Janus said:

A person is innocent until proven guilty.

 

Pettytom-I agree Andrew  should be interviewed. Only then should a decission be make on what comes next.

 

Mr Fisk-I don`t know much  about Andrew, but I do recall he risked his life saving others while hovering his helicopter over a burning ship during the Falklands conflict.

 No royal has been close enough to the action in war to risk his life since Richard III, and he never made it home. Also if somebody with a spare horse had heard Richard cry out, we could have had  a whole different royal lineage than we have today.😉☺️

[ANGELFIRE1]

Andy does a Clinton, "  I have no recollection " odd then there are pictures showing them together, and pictures of him with his arm around the alleged victims waist. Interim report, must do better Andy mate, these pictures don't tell lies. 

 

Angel1.

[Janus]

2 hours ago, Waldo said:

Can you explain how that has any relevance? Unless you're suggesting that the law should be more leniently applied to someone with a service history? Is that what you're suggesting?

Your honour😂

 

You will observe that Mr Fisk described Prince Andrew as "a useless Royal".

 

Bit unjust & insulting don't you think. I pointed out to Mr Fisk what HRH had done for his country. 🖒

 

 

[PRESLEY]

48 minutes ago, Janus said:

Your honour😂

 

You will observe that Mr Fisk described Prince Andrew as "a useless Royal".

 

Bit unjust & insulting don't you think. I pointed out to Mr Fisk what HRH had done for his country. 🖒

 

 

Watching the interview at this moment. God almighty its a joke you can plainly see he is lying his head off, facial give aways body language the lot .  He is denying all the witnesses testamonies.  Clinton must have been is advisor on how handle this interview. 

[Waldo]

2 hours ago, Janus said:

Your honour😂

 

You will observe that Mr Fisk described Prince Andrew as "a useless Royal".

 

Bit unjust & insulting don't you think. I pointed out to Mr Fisk what HRH had done for his country. 🖒

 

 

Ah, I see.

 

I guess a bit off topic then.

 

I don’t know, but often wonder, if having royals involved in military operations is more harmful than helpful. What with all the additional logistics and precautions that will inevitably be taken to keep them out of actual harms way.

Edited November 16, 2019 by Waldo

[Janus]

That's an interesting point Waldo about Royals being in the military.

 

I agree that it can potentially  raise the risk for the other personnel.  This was discussed in the media when Prince Harry was in the military.

Edited November 16, 2019 by Janus

[Eater Sundae]

If I’d met and been photographed with one or even two or three attractive women, I’m certain that I’d remember.

 

However, if there had been dozens of them, and/or I’d been off my head on some recreational drug, then maybe I’d not be able to recollect a particular one either.

 

I thought that a couple of things he said were particularly cringeworthy...

 

That what he did was with honourable intent.

 

and

 

With ”the benefit of hindsight”.  No. Anyone with half a brain should know it was wrong. Hindsight wasn’t needed