Jump to content

What If A Member Of Royal Family Was A Pedo?


Recommended Posts

On 16/11/2019 at 23:24, Longcol said:

These days, "Pedo" just appears to be a lazy term of abuse for anyone having sex with someone in their mid teens - certainly not with a pre-pubescent child.

A minor was involved.  And a victim of sex predators and then grooming, and then sex trafficking.  I definitely think 'pedo' is not a 'lazy' description here but a valid one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, pattricia said:

I thought Emily Maitlis interview was excellent. She comes from Sheffield originally.

I'm disappointed she didn't ask follow-up questions, regarding his 'walk in the park' with Epstein.  I wanted her to ask, 'Why did you feel it necessary to discuss the matter in a park?  Why not in the safety of his home, if you were so trusting of the man?  What did you feel had to be discussed in a park, that couldn't be discussed with Epstein privately in his home?'

 

And also, 'You say you have no recollection of meeting or raping Guiffre, aged 17,  then Roberts, but you say you can remember visiting Pizza Express , as it was a rare event.  Are we to infer from that, that raping 17 year olds is not a rare event for you then?'

 

Also, 'What message does it send to under-age victims of serious sex crimes, when you chose to stay at Epstein's home for four days, after his conviction and subsequent release?  You've said you were an Ambassador for the NSPCC full-stop campaign, and knew what to look for!  What kind of Ambassador are you?'

 

Also, 'The time you spent on Epstein's private island, how did you pass the time?'

 

All in all though, I was glad the interview made him obviously uncomfortable. 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by Lex Luthor
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Longcol said:

And of course quite famously, Jerry Lee Lewis married his 13 year old cousin. And I seem to recall Priscilla was 14 when Elvis started "dating" her.

Yeah, Jerry Lee was kicked out of the UK because of that and all his sold out shows cancelled.Sadly that marriage ended tragically years later,they also lost a child who drowned , I believe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just because they have all the trappings of wealth doesn’t mean that they are different to anybody else, I have no admiration for any of them, the only thing they are good for is that they bring lots of tourists in the country. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, lazarus said:

Just because they have all the trappings of wealth doesn’t mean that they are different to anybody else, I have no admiration for any of them, the only thing they are good for is that they bring lots of tourists in the country. 

The thing is, the tourist rarely see the royals they just vist the buildings, buck palace the tower ect so we could do with out them and not even miss em for what they are worth.  Lets have a President instead but nowt like trump.  :gag:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, lazarus said:

Just because they have all the trappings of wealth doesn’t mean that they are different to anybody else, I have no admiration for any of them, the only thing they are good for is that they bring lots of tourists in the country. 

I have quite a bit of admiration for the Queen but that is it, although Diana's lads seem OK blokes and tolerable.

Edited by Ontarian1981
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.