Jump to content

Consequences Of Brexit [Part 9] Read First Post Before Posting


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, West 77 said:

The contract was agreed  by Theresa May.  If Theresa May was still Prime Minister then Britain would still be in the EU.

 

There is nothing to worry about French border control searching cars. Let's hope they get more strict and search all vehicles coming to Britain once the transitional period ends.

It wasn’t the car search, it was the massive queues and huge delays that were the main problem.

 

The freight queue looked even worse 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another consequence of Brexit:

 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/amp/world-europe-51594002

 

A €75 billion funding gap in the upcoming EU budget & disagreements amongst the countries involved. 

 

"Slightly more cash for agriculture to APPEASE FRANCE." There's a sentence not often heard, eh? 

 

Ok UK, move along. Nothing for you to see here or be concerned about. 

Edited by Baron99
Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, Pettytom said:

Had I turned up at the recommended time, I would have missed my train for certain.

 

The trains were running more or less to time, but this is only February. 

Ahh, the train not the ferry.

 

Poor show from UK border control then. Then again, I'm not surprised, they and the Government have only had a mere three years to prepare.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 21/02/2020 at 13:08, Mister Gee said:

Did you see the woman on Question Time last night mel? They’ve got their Brexit and the end of freedom of movement but they’re still very unhappy. There really is no appeasing some of these people and I worry where it’s heading.

Seems shes been identified and has links to Britain first, The NF and Tommy Robinson surprise surprise so shes into brexit for the same reasons as a few on here.

https://zelo-street.blogspot.com/2020/02/question-time-ranter-identified.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 21/02/2020 at 21:29, Branyy said:

She asked a question and stated her anti-immigration opinion. The question was completely valid and she's entitled to have her opinion without being called a racist.

I disagree, if her opinion identifies her as a racist then the external viewer is entitled to have their opinion, and if their opinion is that she is a racist, then so be it. You can't have it both ways.

2 minutes ago, Car Boot said:

YOUR BBC - uncritically pumping out racist rants. 

 

Make sure you pay your Licence fee.

Freedom of speech... if we went to subscription you would lose that - Looks like CarBoot wants a Stalinist regime where what you say is controlled by Herr Boris...

True colours come through in the end.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.