Jump to content

Coronavirus - Part Two.


Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, onewheeldave said:

The vast majority of those 40,000 were in the main extremely ill and would likely have died in the very near future anyway.

Wrong again - although you keep repeating it  - "underlying conditions" (which are attributed to about 95% of covid deaths) and "at deaths door / extremely ill" are two separate things.

 

https://www.sheffieldforum.co.uk/topic/473199-coronavirus-part-two/page/96/?tab=comments#comment-8368062

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Longcol said:

Wrong again - although you keep repeating it  - "underlying conditions" (which are attributed to about 95% of covid deaths) and "at deaths door / extremely ill" are two separate things.

 

https://www.sheffieldforum.co.uk/topic/473199-coronavirus-part-two/page/96/?tab=comments#comment-8368062

 

Yes, I recall refuting your confused claim. For whatever reason/s you do not listen to what I'm actually saying- try these

 

https://patient.info/news-and-features/covid-19-coronavirus-what-is-an-underlying-health-condition

 

https://www.who.int/classifications/icd/Guidelines_Cause_of_Death_COVID-19.pdf?ua=1#:~:text=There is increasing evidence that,to COVID-19.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, onewheeldave said:

Where does it say people with underlying conditions are "extremely ill"?

 

btw your "refutation" was refuted - so you started banging on about Sweden again soon afterwards.

 

https://www.sheffieldforum.co.uk/topic/473199-coronavirus-part-two/page/97/?tab=comments#comment-8368098

 

Edited by Longcol
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Longcol said:

Because you claimed

 

"The vast majority of those 40,000 were in the main extremely ill and would likely have died in the very near future anyway."

 

https://www.sheffieldforum.co.uk/topic/473199-coronavirus-part-two/page/110/?tab=comments#comment-8368799

 

Fair point; on reflection that is not accurate. I'd say the majority were extremely ill (diabetes, heart disease etc], very old, and, a fair number of them would have died in the near future either from their health conditions, their advanced age or, whatever infectious disease they got exposed to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, onewheeldave said:

Fair point; on reflection that is not accurate. I'd say the majority were extremely ill (diabetes, heart disease etc], very old, and, a fair number of them would have died in the near future either from their health conditions, their advanced age or, whatever infectious disease they got exposed to.

And your evidence is.........................................................................

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.