Jump to content

Coronavirus - Part Two.


Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, apelike said:

I agree and anyone with any sense can see that. The problem now is from those who were annoyed he didn't agree to one at the time as now he has announced one and they have got what they wanted the results will obviously be a whitewash and not to their liking despite it being independant.

Can you name one successful major public enquiry that didn't need at least two attempts to get right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, hackey lad said:

What is right? The outcome that you are happy with?

The purpose of a public inquiry is for the authorities to learn lessons of what went wrong, and what went right; so that God forbid, should we have another pandemic, future Governments will have the results of the inquiry to refer back to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Mister M said:

The purpose of a public inquiry is for the authorities to learn lessons of what went wrong, and what went right; so that God forbid, should we have another pandemic, future Governments will have the results of the inquiry to refer back to.

People will focus on what went wrong, and go down the path of anti-government. 

It'll just be a political fight about who paid who what, when really, almost no countries dealt with it well - which realistically was bound to happen (we know now with hindsight).

Only countries who have experienced it before knew the risks. It barely made the news in the first few weeks, and if after a few cases Britain had said, "right there are a few thousand cases of pnuemonia on the other side of the world"...  Brits, would all go home and stay quiet for 3 months? 

 

It will say,

10,000 lives could have been saved if x wasn't done 7 days earlier

23,000 """"""

127,000 """"

 

Now we've all experienced a pandemic, the main thing that we ALL will learn, is next time a new virus emerges... take it seriously!

 

Really, we have got off quite lightly as a world. If this virus had a high contigaious as it was, and much higher death rate... the whole world would be in complete chaos now.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, *_ash_* said:

People will focus on what went wrong, and go down the path of anti-government. 

It'll just be a political fight about who paid who what, when really, almost no countries dealt with it well - which realistically was bound to happen (we know now with hindsight).

Only countries who have experienced it before knew the risks. It barely made the news in the first few weeks, and if after a few cases Britain had said, "right there are a few thousand cases of pnuemonia on the other side of the world"...  Brits, would all go home and stay quiet for 3 months? 

 

It will say,

10,000 lives could have been saved if x wasn't done 7 days earlier

23,000 """"""

127,000 """"

 

Now we've all experienced a pandemic, the main thing that we ALL will learn, is next time a new virus emerges... take it seriously!

 

Really, we have got off quite lightly as a world. If this virus had a high contigaious as it was, and much higher death rate... the whole world would be in complete chaos now.

 

Your first sentence says it all . Its already happening and we havent even had the enquiry .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, hackey lad said:

 I agree with you , so lets see the outcome of the enquiry first .

Can you think of one any government got right first time, or do you think this will be it?

2 minutes ago, hackey lad said:

Your first sentence says it all . Its already happening and we havent even had the enquiry .

Would there be much point in criticising the opposition? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, *_ash_* said:

People will focus on what went wrong, and go down the path of anti-government. 

It'll just be a political fight about who paid who what, when really, almost no countries dealt with it well - which realistically was bound to happen (we know now with hindsight).

Only countries who have experienced it before knew the risks. It barely made the news in the first few weeks, and if after a few cases Britain had said, "right there are a few thousand cases of pnuemonia on the other side of the world"...  Brits, would all go home and stay quiet for 3 months? 

 

It will say,

10,000 lives could have been saved if x wasn't done 7 days earlier

23,000 """"""

127,000 """"

 

Now we've all experienced a pandemic, the main thing that we ALL will learn, is next time a new virus emerges... take it seriously!

 

Really, we have got off quite lightly as a world. If this virus had a high contigaious as it was, and much higher death rate... the whole world would be in complete chaos now.

 

But it wasnt a case of few cases of pneumonia on the other side of the world, it was tens of thousands in Western Europe and we waved them in to watch the football. Let's not change what happened, they'll be plenty to do that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.