Jump to content

Coronavirus - Part Two.


Recommended Posts

Just now, Annie Bynnol said:

These pages should act as a warning to those who find themselves dabbling with Conspiracy Theories.

The first stage is becoming attached to a Conspiracy - it does not matter which one.

Then they proceed to bore the pants off your family, friends and other social media fora, with "Did you know...?"-most switch off.

The Conspiracy Theorist finds comfort and support with like minded and assertions of self styled 'leaders'.

They stylized language used, the quality of the sources, the failure to engage in discussion, the inability to recognise any flaws or weaknesses and condescending attitude to non-believers are all signature behaviours.

 

Normally challenging Conspiracy Theorists is nothing more than an intellectual exercise.

 

But now we have political extremists populating and funding Conspiracy Theories.

We now have actual harm being done to people influenced by political power seeking organizations using Conspiracy Theory as a vehicle.

 

 

You believe politicians with vested interests though, laughable.

2 minutes ago, altus said:

No, I want to know if you are claiming something that's been quoted out of context to give a misleading impression. The fact that you don't post links to your sources shows you know your claims are unreliable.

Not got time to fully read it at the moment but this is possibly the one, I’ll read in full when I’ve got more time before you start jumping up and down.

 

https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/medical-device-recalls/innova-medical-group-recalls-unauthorized-sars-cov-2-antigen-rapid-qualitative-test-risk-false-test

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Carbuncle said:

Well I haven't clicked on the link but just from the text it does not seem to refer to the PCR test. So that's one more debunked.

Like I said I'll read it later, its not debunked its just finding the right link which is not easy when the weight of information against anything Covid related is suppressed by search engines.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest makapaka
13 minutes ago, top4718 said:

Like I said I'll read it later, its not debunked its just finding the right link which is not easy when the weight of information against anything Covid related is suppressed by search engines.

I think I get it now - you’re winding people up for a laugh aren’t you ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, makapaka said:

I think I get it now - you’re winding people up for a laugh aren’t you ?

More like, repeated misleading claims about something on the FDA web site from a conspiracy theorist website and is having trouble finding anything to back it up (because the CT web site didn't post a source either).

 

There's no point reading links described as "It might be this". I'll wait for one described as "It's definitely this". top4718 need to realise their claim isn't assumed true unless debunked but assumed false unless supported/verified.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, top4718 said:

If they need a different test to differentiate that means the current one isn't doing its job which is exactly the point.

 

Fear and coercion has/is a major driver with anything Covid related as the reality doesn't match up to what the MSM portrays.

Sorry, your logic is wrong. The current one identifies Covid, the CDC proposal is for one test to include flu also, which is exactly the point.

Edited by Bargepole23
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, top4718 said:

I posted a link to an article showing no significant increase in funerals in a whole range of areas of the UK, so either one has to be untrue, you can't have excess deaths without excess funerals.

 

Have a look for it.

 

Having said that if you can't spell Boris it might not be for you.

I could post an official document signed by President Biden and you'd still deny its authenticity. If you want to keep believing the party line carry on, its starting to unravel and some on here are going to look very foolish indeed.

Here's a link from the Cremation Society, showing an additional 70000 cremations last year, compared to the previous year, , circa 14% increase on numbers which have remained fairly constant for the previous few years.

 

https://www.cremation.org.uk/content/files/Table of Cremations 2020 for Website.pdf

 

Do you know where those additional bodies have come from?

Edited by Bargepole23
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.