trastrick Posted August 31, 2021 Share Posted August 31, 2021 Just now, Magilla said: Rosenstein was Trumps pick It wasn't phony... people went to prison, Trump wasn't exonerated. Reports on the day that have subsequently turned out to be false: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-mueller-fbi-idUSKCN1UJ27A Only via the shadow docket, add in regular cases... Trump has the worst record at the Supreme Court of any modern president: https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2020/07/20/trump-has-worst-record-supreme-court-any-modern-president/ U.S. Supreme Court dumps last of Trump's election appeals: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-election-idUSKBN2B01LE The Supreme Court saved Obamacare: https://www.politico.com/news/2021/06/24/supreme-court-obamacare-law-495755 You obviously failed to read it, this refers only to cases brought via emergency applications. A Supreme Court win is a Supreme Court win. Including shadow applications. "The Atlantic", no friend of Trump, complains, "the U.S. Supreme Court is Trump's Enforcer" https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/09/the-supreme-court-is-trumps-enforcer/598081/ You shouldn't be surprised, according to WIKI; "Legal Affairs of Donald Trump" "In June 2016, USA Today published an analysis of litigation involving Donald Trump, which found that over the previous three decades Trump and his businesses have been involved in 3,500 legal cases in U.S. federal and state courts, an unprecedented number for a U.S. presidential candidate.[1] Of the 3,500 suits, Trump or one of his companies were plaintiffs in 1,900; defendants in 1,450; and bankruptcy, third party, or other in 150.[1] Trump was named in at least 169 suits in federal court.[2] Over 150 other cases were in the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit Court of Florida (covering Broward County, Florida) since 1983.[3 "In the 1,300 cases where the record establishes the outcome, Trump settled 175 times, lost 38, won 450, and had another 137 cases end with some other outcome. In the other 500 cases, judges dismissed plaintiffs' claims against Trump.[1]" That's 450 clear wins, wins, plus 500 suits against him dismissed. 950 wins against 350 losses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magilla Posted August 31, 2021 Share Posted August 31, 2021 2 minutes ago, trastrick said: A Supreme Court win is a Supreme Court win. Including shadow applications. In total, Trump lost more than he won. 2 minutes ago, trastrick said: "The Atlantic", no friend of Trump, complains, "the U.S. Supreme Court is Trump's Enforcer" https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/09/the-supreme-court-is-trumps-enforcer/598081/ I don't subscribe, so can't read it until next month... but, since he lost more cases than he won, mostly it isn't 2 minutes ago, trastrick said: You shouldn't be surprised, according to WIKI; "Legal Affairs of Donald Trump" "In June 2016, USA Today published an analysis of litigation involving Donald Trump, which found that over the previous three decades Trump and his businesses have been involved in 3,500 legal cases in U.S. federal and state courts, an unprecedented number for a U.S. presidential candidate.[1] Of the 3,500 suits, Trump or one of his companies were plaintiffs in 1,900; defendants in 1,450; and bankruptcy, third party, or other in 150.[1] Trump was named in at least 169 suits in federal court.[2] Over 150 other cases were in the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit Court of Florida (covering Broward County, Florida) since 1983.[3 "In the 1,300 cases where the record establishes the outcome, Trump settled 175 times, lost 38, won 450, and had another 137 cases end with some other outcome. In the other 500 cases, judges dismissed plaintiffs' claims against Trump.[1]" That's 450 clear wins, wins, plus 500 suits against him dismissed. 950 wins against 350 losses. The desperation is palpable! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baron99 Posted September 1, 2021 Share Posted September 1, 2021 "Are we keeping you from something more important, Mr President?" https://nypost.com/2021/08/30/biden-ripped-for-apparently-looking-at-watch-at-troops-ceremony/ Commander-in-Chief, what a laugh. Having had a son in the forces, you'd think Sleepy Joe would know how to show some respect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
butlers Posted September 1, 2021 Share Posted September 1, 2021 Outrageous on his part,must be setting a new low in Presidential decorum. https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theatlantic.com/amp/article/615997/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carbuncle Posted September 1, 2021 Share Posted September 1, 2021 1 hour ago, Baron99 said: "Are we keeping you from something more important, Mr President?" https://nypost.com/2021/08/30/biden-ripped-for-apparently-looking-at-watch-at-troops-ceremony/ Commander-in-Chief, what a laugh. Having had a son in the forces, you'd think Sleepy Joe would know how to show some respect. Really? Doesn't this strike you as a bit weak: Joe Biden checked his watch when he should be standing respectfully. It's not a great look but given he's just capitulated to the Taliban in Afghanistan it really isn't Earth shattering. 49 minutes ago, butlers said: Outrageous on his part,must be setting a new low in Presidential decorum. https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theatlantic.com/amp/article/615997/ And of course Trump makes "a disrespectfully looking at one's watch" story look like the triviality it is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyclecar Posted September 1, 2021 Share Posted September 1, 2021 We shouldnt get too hung up worrrying about all the military tackle left behind by the US military. Getting it all back to America in good condition would have been a logistical nightmare - Afghanistan has no coastal port - so a lot of it would have been scrapped anyway. Five minutes 'behind the dashboard' removing some electronic control units renders them unusable. Anyway, Taliban have no trained pilots. And there is no jet fuel left at Kabul airport. I bet the air traffic control system is off as well. Although there is a wanted ad on EBay for a Chinook workshop manual.........🙂🙂 But it's food for thought that they have taken control of the whole country without air cover, bombers, drones, tanks, misiles, cyber warfare and all the other stuff that we have been told is essential to modern combat. Why do we bother with ballistic missile subs? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Box11 Posted September 1, 2021 Share Posted September 1, 2021 1 hour ago, Cyclecar said: We shouldnt get too hung up worrrying about all the military tackle left behind by the US military. Getting it all back to America in good condition would have been a logistical nightmare - Afghanistan has no coastal port - so a lot of it would have been scrapped anyway. Five minutes 'behind the dashboard' removing some electronic control units renders them unusable. Anyway, Taliban have no trained pilots. And there is no jet fuel left at Kabul airport. I bet the air traffic control system is off as well. Although there is a wanted ad on EBay for a Chinook workshop manual.........🙂🙂 But it's food for thought that they have taken control of the whole country without air cover, bombers, drones, tanks, misiles, cyber warfare and all the other stuff that we have been told is essential to modern combat. Why do we bother with ballistic missile subs? Good point..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magilla Posted September 2, 2021 Share Posted September 2, 2021 17 hours ago, Baron99 said: "Are we keeping you from something more important, Mr President?" https://nypost.com/2021/08/30/biden-ripped-for-apparently-looking-at-watch-at-troops-ceremony/ Commander-in-Chief, what a laugh. Having had a son in the forces, you'd think Sleepy Joe would know how to show some respect. A crazy notion, but maybe... just maybe... he wanted to know the time? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cuttsie Posted September 2, 2021 Share Posted September 2, 2021 If a army of 75.000 religious nut cases decided to attack we in England they would not get as far as the first motor way service station , so how as that rag tag illiterate mob managed to take over 40 million people without a fight . The whole story stinks of pre planning by the departing occupiers . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Box11 Posted September 2, 2021 Share Posted September 2, 2021 17 minutes ago, cuttsie said: If a army of 75.000 religious nut cases decided to attack we in England they would not get as far as the first motor way service station , so how as that rag tag illiterate mob managed to take over 40 million people without a fight . The whole story stinks of pre planning by the departing occupiers . Very much a possibility !!!..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now