Magilla Posted January 28, 2022 Share Posted January 28, 2022 (edited) 44 minutes ago, SheffieldBricky said: Pennsylvania Supreme court just announced Mail In Voting is unconstitutional. Wrong, the ruling came from an appellate court Quote Democrats changed the law illegally to cheat. Wrong! The state Legislature is Republican-controlled, the mail voting laws passed with overwhelming bipartisan support https://www.spotlightpa.org/news/2022/01/pennsylvania-mail-voting-unconstitutional-supreme-court-appeal/ "The ruling by Commonwealth Court comes in response to suits filed by Bradford County Commissioner Doug McLinko and a group of Republican state representatives — many of whom voted for Act 77, the 2019 law that expanded no-excuse mail voting in Pennsylvania." 11 of the 14 people who brought the appeal, voted for expanded mail in voting in 2019! They only got cold feet after Trump spat the dummy. Quote The decertification of Pennsylvania begins and that's without all the fraud and Zuckerbucks illegal influence. Nope! There is no evidence to suggest the mailed in ballots were in any way fraudulent. They still count. This ruling, even if it ultimately stands, would only effect future elections You can't even get the basics right Edited January 28, 2022 by Magilla Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
butlers Posted January 28, 2022 Share Posted January 28, 2022 Not sure if Bricky peddles misinformation or us just a sucker for it As to mail in voting ,Colorado has done it for near twenty years and got high praise for it's security by the Department of Homeland Security. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
altus Posted January 28, 2022 Share Posted January 28, 2022 28 minutes ago, SheffieldBricky said: Pennsylvania Supreme court just announced Mail In Voting is unconstitutional. Democrats changed the law illegally to cheat. The decertification of Pennsylvania begins and that's without all the fraud and Zuckerbucks illegal influence. Do pay attention to what you are claiming. A Pennsylvania commonwealth court has ruled that the changes to the states mail in voting rules are unconstitutional. There are two ways the facts conflict with your post:- They haven't ruled mail in voting unconstitutional, that would harm Republicans more than Democrats, just the recent changes to allow more people to use it. They are not the state's supreme court. An appeal will no doubt be winging it's way to that shortly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
butlers Posted January 28, 2022 Share Posted January 28, 2022 Also the election count can not be decertified after the new president is in Office And the idea that a rogue set of " electors " could vote against the publics popular is against the 14 the Admentment and is ruled out by the Constitution Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SheffieldBricky Posted January 28, 2022 Share Posted January 28, 2022 1 hour ago, Magilla said: Wrong, the ruling came from an appellate court Wrong! The state Legislature is Republican-controlled, the mail voting laws passed with overwhelming bipartisan support https://www.spotlightpa.org/news/2022/01/pennsylvania-mail-voting-unconstitutional-supreme-court-appeal/ "The ruling by Commonwealth Court comes in response to suits filed by Bradford County Commissioner Doug McLinko and a group of Republican state representatives — many of whom voted for Act 77, the 2019 law that expanded no-excuse mail voting in Pennsylvania." 11 of the 14 people who brought the appeal, voted for expanded mail in voting in 2019! They only got cold feet after Trump spat the dummy. Nope! There is no evidence to suggest the mailed in ballots were in any way fraudulent. They still count. This ruling, even if it ultimately stands, would only effect future elections You can't even get the basics right If I was you I'd get in touch with the judge and point out the clanger he has made. Maybe he will offer you a job as an adviser. The judge ruled that changing the rules was unconstitutional so that negates anything that happened using it. Plenty in the states saying the election will be decertified. Anyway if not it will make it impossible for them to cheat again... 1 hour ago, altus said: Do pay attention to what you are claiming. A Pennsylvania commonwealth court has ruled that the changes to the states mail in voting rules are unconstitutional. There are two ways the facts conflict with your post:- They haven't ruled mail in voting unconstitutional, that would harm Republicans more than Democrats, just the recent changes to allow more people to use it. They are not the state's supreme court. An appeal will no doubt be winging it's way to that shortly. You seem to not understand that the senate has overall power to do as they wish. They will use this outcome as evidence of the fraud. They already thought it was fraudulent before this ruling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
butlers Posted January 28, 2022 Share Posted January 28, 2022 The PA Supreme Court has already adjudicated a similar case post the election, don't get your hopes up. They were scathing about the plaintiffs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magilla Posted January 28, 2022 Share Posted January 28, 2022 (edited) 1 hour ago, SheffieldBricky said: If I was you I'd get in touch with the judge and point out the clanger he has made. Maybe he will offer you a job as an adviser. It's a woman Quote The judge ruled that changing the rules was unconstitutional so that negates anything that happened using it. Nope, it doesn't Quote Plenty in the states saying the election will be decertified. All deluded, no legal reason to do so, no chance whatsoever. Quote Anyway if not it will make it impossible for them to cheat again... You seem to not understand that the senate has overall power to do as they wish. They will use this outcome as evidence of the fraud. They already thought it was fraudulent before this ruling. There was no cheating, the votes are valid and still stand. It isn't evidence of fraud. Edited January 28, 2022 by Magilla Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SheffieldBricky Posted January 28, 2022 Share Posted January 28, 2022 1 hour ago, Magilla said: It's a woman Nope, it doesn't All deluded, no legal reason to do so, no chance whatsoever. There was no cheating, the votes are valid and still stand. It isn't evidence of fraud. Oh well, you are so partisan that there is no saving you. Only time will tell. Remember when Democrats said Trump paid Russian prostitutes to urinate on him and you all believed it? 🤣🤣🤣 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
butlers Posted January 28, 2022 Share Posted January 28, 2022 Yeah we nearly believed he would show his excellent tax returns and that he was a billionaire too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zinger549 Posted January 28, 2022 Share Posted January 28, 2022 2 hours ago, butlers said: Yeah we nearly believed he would show his excellent tax returns and that he was a billionaire too Supposedly worth $2.5 billion, same as last year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now