Jump to content

Colin Pitchfork To Be Released From Prison


Recommended Posts

He is being released because the parole board have assessed him fit to do so. They reached its decision independent, with full context, full facts and applying the relevant laws and regulations.

 

They are professionals who are not subject to the sort of emotive, reactionary and uninformed opinion of bystanders nor the hysterical, speculative, sensationalszed and biased opinions of media outlets looking to generate hype to sell their product.

 

Whether people like it or not, we don't lock away and throw away the key in this country. This man was convicted, sentenced and served their time  and tariff as set by the judge.

 

The only authorised authority has made the decision to release and should not feel bullied or harassed by the masses throwing around their opinions. Asking any lay member of the public whether a convicted criminal should be released will never lead to the answer being yes - so that's why ill-informed lay members of the public off the street don't get a say.  Good grief, if the Board buckled every time there was push back on their decision the prisons will be overflowing and the whole concept of punish AND rehabilitation would be worthless.

 

As for that Mirror article, quite frankly what's it got to do with him.  He was a QC on the conviction side so what else is he supposed to say. Shock horror he disagrees with the decision of the parole board and makes completely uncorroborated guesses at what a court might have done if presented with such case today. Hardly rational evidence.   Just a nice little earner from the Daily Mirror for some words from a has been.

 

Articles like that and the twitterati throwing their opinions emphasises the reason why the parole board decision making is so needed to be independent.

Edited by ECCOnoob
Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, ECCOnoob said:

He is being released because the parole board have assessed him fit to do so. They reached its decision independent, with full context, full facts and applying the relevant laws and regulations.

 

They are professionals who are not subject to the sort of emotive, reactionary and uninformed opinion of bystanders nor the hysterical, speculative, sensationalszed and biased opinions of media outlets looking to generate hype to sell their product.

 

Whether people like it or not, we don't lock away and throw away the key in this country. This man was convicted, sentenced and served their time  and tariff as set by the judge.

 

The only authorised authority has made the decision to release and should not feel bullied or harassed by the masses throwing around their opinions. Asking any lay member of the public whether a convicted criminal should be released will never lead to the answer being yes - so that's why ill-informed lay members of the public off the street don't get a say.  Good grief, if the Board buckled every time there was push back on their decision the prisons will be overflowing and the whole concept of punish AND rehabilitation would be worthless.

 

As for that Mirror article, quite frankly what's it got to do with him.  He was a QC on the conviction side so what else is he supposed to say. Shock horror he disagrees with the decision of the parole board and makes completely uncorroborated guesses at what a court might have done if presented with such case today. Hardly rational evidence.   Just a nice little earner from the Daily Mirror for some words from a has been.

 

Articles like that and the twitterati throwing their opinions emphasises the reason why the parole board decision making is so needed to be independent.

That goes on the assumption that parole boards never get it wrong. I watched a programme where a guy was convicted of kidnapping,rape and attempted murder of a child, was released after 3 years and went onto kill 5 - at least.

 

I'm all for rehabilitation but this looks wrong. Two calculated, pretty sadistic killings some time apart. I'm not sure that's something that can be rehabilitated. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, ECCOnoob said:

He is being released because the parole board have assessed him fit to do so. They reached its decision independent, with full context, full facts and applying the relevant laws and regulations.

 

They are professionals who are not subject to the sort of emotive, reactionary and uninformed opinion of bystanders nor the hysterical, speculative, sensationalszed and biased opinions of media outlets looking to generate hype to sell their product.

 

Whether people like it or not, we don't lock away and throw away the key in this country. This man was convicted, sentenced and served their time  and tariff as set by the judge.

 

The only authorised authority has made the decision to release and should not feel bullied or harassed by the masses throwing around their opinions. Asking any lay member of the public whether a convicted criminal should be released will never lead to the answer being yes - so that's why ill-informed lay members of the public off the street don't get a say.  Good grief, if the Board buckled every time there was push back on their decision the prisons will be overflowing and the whole concept of punish AND rehabilitation would be worthless.

 

As for that Mirror article, quite frankly what's it got to do with him.  He was a QC on the conviction side so what else is he supposed to say. Shock horror he disagrees with the decision of the parole board and makes completely uncorroborated guesses at what a court might have done if presented with such case today. Hardly rational evidence.   Just a nice little earner from the Daily Mirror for some words from a has been.

 

Articles like that and the twitterati throwing their opinions emphasises the reason why the parole board decision making is so needed to be independent.

A sensible post, albeit laced with the usual pomposity and superiority. I mean, the parole board can get it wrong (cf. John Warboys, who they did a reverse on) but obviously they have access to much more information than the rest of us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 21/06/2021 at 23:56, The_DADDY said:

And if he repeats his crimes? 

That has been know to happen  

He goes back to prison and dies in prison, don't forget there's also a lot of restrictions and legal requirements for his release too to limit reoffending

Edited by melthebell
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, melthebell said:

He goes back to prison and dies in prison, don't forget there's also a lot of restrictions and legal requirements for his release too to limit reoffending

I think I'd be more comfortable if he was to just stay in prison. Why run the risk of him murdering again? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, The_DADDY said:

I think I'd be more comfortable if he was to just stay in prison. Why run the risk of him murdering again? 

thats not how prison works in this country, why not just lock everybody up just in case 10 of them become murderers?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, melthebell said:

thats not how prison works in this country, why not just lock everybody up just in case 10 of them become murderers?

Because that would be stupid. 

Anyway, let's hope Mr Pitchfork has 100% reformed and he doesn't decide he's going to rape and murder any more children 👍

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.